100% ad-free
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE(Ian Warren @ Sep 19 2007, 10:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Bucaneer .... the plane that can carry a bucket of sunshine on each wing......
..um OH BUGGER!
Heh they were somewhat underpowered as I recall...And heres what the RAF used in the interim (until the Tornado arrived) instead of the TSR-2 - the Blackburn Bucaneer ...Theres a couple of private ones still flying in South Africa (their Air Force also had a small sqaudron of them).
Those guys will also give you a ride in that other Cold War Brit, not so underpowered, the English Electric Lightning!
Now I do believe my hard drive harbours one of those somewhere for a screenshot.
Watch this space.







I especially like the Vulcan - I was lucky to see one fly over New Plymouth at an airshow when I was about 8 years old - hopefully the one in the UK that is intact gets airborne again.
Naki wrote:QUOTE(Naki @ Sep 24 2007, 08:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Awesome pics Ian- I especially like the Vulcan - I was lucky to see one fly over New Plymouth at an airshow when I was about 8 years old - hopefully the one in the UK that is intact gets airborne again.
VULCANS - Recently XH558 was rolled out after complete strip and mantainace checks .. I had same experience 1973/74 Avonhead primary school , still recall teacher with a stupid remark ... ' now children , the reason its so quite is to sneak up on there enemy '
Trolly wrote:QUOTE(Trolly @ Sep 25 2007, 12:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I love the Vulcan too, great screenie of it IanI haven't seen one in the air, but I've been inside a static one parked at RAF Hendon Air Museum in London. It's sheer size and shape absolute fascinated me, I wish I was around while they were still in service!
Apparently they were really leaky and uneconomical to operate, and the RAF ended up selling them to the public for 1 pound a piece! I can't wait to see this newly restored one up and flying
Great plane , many USAF pilots during '83 Red Flag' could not believe just how it could sllip lockon during mock combat , it size really made them look !Andrew the internals of that model would bring back memories




Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE(Ian Warren @ Sep 20 2007, 08:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Charl WICKED LIGHTNING ... SO QUIK .... again read how these puppies were waxing USAF Phamtoms ... so manouvable F4 jocks almost gave up
Ha! It's like a chain letter innit? Another Cold Warrior somewhere on my hard drive!
But what the Phantom II had, was a pair 'o JT9D kickass motors...and later a gun.
(And Top Gun, eventually). Sorta sad that they still fly, but only as drones to be shot down.Lookin at shots so many variant s ... my fav was the Camo then Low Vis , think Binbrook operators
Never could get used to the overwing ordnance thing.
What was the other one with that? Jaguar? BAe Heritage showing through there.














Naki wrote:QUOTE(Naki @ Sep 19 2007, 09:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>...Canada's Cold War "what might of been", the CF-105 Arrow. It is in formation with the aircaft it intended to replace - the CF-100. If it went into service it would of been without doubt the best fighter in the world at the time - the emphasis was on speed, climb rate, an advanced missle & radar system and range. Unfortunately (as with the TSR-2) it got canned and Canada bought second hand USAF F-101 Voodoos instead.
...a horrible little aeroplane, the Voodoo, they got lucky the Russians didn't come over the Bering at 'em right then.
Now that Arrow is exactly what was in the back of a homework notebook of a kid in those days!
And the wide-track undercarriage! The wingbox must've been as strong as a railway bridge.
Probably as heavy too, I suspect they could do little more than go straight up and kill the incoming, then go back and roost.
Which brings immediately to mind: Starfighter, must find a Starfighter...
And, er, thanks Ian about the landing weight thing, before I made a foolish mistake with the Victor.
Ohakea can handle that stuff OK, but turns out the F-16's need the brake chute to land.Last edited by Charl on Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Charl wrote:QUOTE(Charl @ Sep 20 2007, 10:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>...a horrible little aeroplane, the Voodoo, they got lucky the Russians didn't come over the Bering at 'em right then.
Now that Arrow is exactly what was in the back of a homework notebook of a kid in those days!
And the wide-track undercarriage! The wingbox must've been as strong as a railway bridge.
Probably as heavy too, I suspect they could do little more than go straight up and kill the incoming, then go back and roost.
Which brings immediately to mind: Starfighter, must find a Starfighter...
A Voodoo is not exactly small. Yeah the Arrow wouldn't of being exactly agile but it was designed for patrolling the vast Canadian air space for pesky Russians.
F-104 - Captain Sim have one but Cloud 9s even better and no I don't have either but thats what the reviews say.
Charl wrote:QUOTE(Charl @ Sep 25 2007, 10:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>And, er, thanks Ian about the landing weight thing, before I made a foolish mistake with the Victor.
Ohakea can handle that stuff OK, but turns out the F-16's need the brake chute to land.
Why would that be? Not all countries F-16s carry brake chutes most of them don't as the F-16 uses aerobraking to slow down.(minimum is 3000ft or 914m) Ohakea runway 15/33 is 7000ft long with a landing distance of 5000ft.Last edited by SUBS17 on Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests