one more Fokker

Post and comment on screen captures from the beautiful game here. Home of the monthly screenshot competition

one more Fokker

Postby jankees » Mon Jan 20, 2025 4:12 am

nearly done:
Image2781(00001) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr

Image2781(00002) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr

Image2781(00004) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr

Image2781(00005) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr

Image2781(00006) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr

Image2781(00007) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr

Image2781(00009) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr

Image2781(00011) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr
jankees
Senior Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:31 pm
Posts: 1590

Re: one more Fokker

Postby Splitpin » Mon Jan 20, 2025 5:51 am

JK :bow: downloading the old girl now.
I'm one very happy old Fokker fella :wub: Thanks very much .
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 20518
Location: Christchurch NZ

Re: one more Fokker

Postby Charl » Mon Jan 20, 2025 8:25 am

Beautiful paint of a beautiful clean livery :clap:

Quite noticeable in say, shot#5, is the dorsal fin fillet, and I wondered if it was an afterthought to improve longitudinal stability.
So I went trawling, didn't find anything to support that thought.

Such a benign looking aircraft. The Friendship name suits it.
But in casting about the interweb, found it has quite the accident record.
It has killed over 900 people in 28 incidents over the years. :o
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9078
Location: Auckland

Re: one more Fokker

Postby Naki » Mon Jan 20, 2025 8:32 am

Ouch...I'm still alive!...travelled on Air NZ/NAC F-27s quite a few times from New Plymouth to Wellington and Auckland.
User avatar
Naki
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:03 pm
Posts: 7028
Location: Tauranga

Re: one more Fokker

Postby cowpatz » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:14 am

Yes NAC lost one on approach to AKL in 1979.
2 killed. Only 4 on board.
The aircraft type did operate into some dodgy areas and with some equally dodgy operators.
The aircraft doesn’t have any tricky issues but it does have a lightly built rear end and “high speed flight” through turbulence was not recommended.
It was also an entry level airliner with low hour crews. It would be interesting to see what the mix of pilot error versus aircraft faults is.
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3536

Re: one more Fokker

Postby SA227 » Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:11 am

That is a nice paint job ;)

It is a benign aircraft to fly. In terms of handling, certainly a nice aircraft to hand fly. With an engine failure on a hot day you are going around that tree rather than over it :P

As cowpatz says, some dodgy operators and some cases, really dumb pilots
SA227
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:11 pm
Posts: 357

Re: one more Fokker

Postby simonh » Mon Jan 20, 2025 4:04 pm

Great shots , all of them. They almost look like real photos.
simonh
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:31 pm
Posts: 421

Re: one more Fokker

Postby jankees » Fri Jan 24, 2025 8:18 pm

ok, one more then. Fun detail, I think I've flown on this aircraft, a long long time ago

Imageansett (00002) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr

Imageansett (00004) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr

Imageansett (00008) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr

Imageansett (00011) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr.
jankees
Senior Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:31 pm
Posts: 1590

Re: one more Fokker

Postby Splitpin » Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:45 am

Safely in the hanger....thanks JK , nice work :rockon:
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 20518
Location: Christchurch NZ

Re: one more Fokker

Postby cowpatz » Sat Jan 25, 2025 11:18 am

So many of the Fokkers!
Great to see.
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3536


Return to Screenshots

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests