New free mesh out for NZ and AU

An area to discuss scenery addons for virtual NZ

Postby scon » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:11 pm

Just new to flightsim.com is a new mesh for AU and NZ. Comes in 4 parts just I'm downloading now. For FSX

File Names are

aunz1.zip
aunz2.zip
aunz3.zip
aunz4.zip
scon
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 7:16 pm
Posts: 963
Location: NZ

Postby JonARNZ » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:13 pm

Resolution? Well spotted!
ARNZX flightsim.co.nz
Asus Sabretooth X79 MB | i73930K CPU | 8GB DDR3 1600 C7 Ram | GTX 560Ti DCII OC | Corsair H80 Water Cooling
User avatar
JonARNZ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:49 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Auckland

Postby scon » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:14 pm

JonARNZ wrote: Resolution? Well spotted!

Don't know the Resolution yet
scon
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 7:16 pm
Posts: 963
Location: NZ

Postby JonARNZ » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:17 pm

Yeah, the readme gives nothing away either...
ARNZX flightsim.co.nz
Asus Sabretooth X79 MB | i73930K CPU | 8GB DDR3 1600 C7 Ram | GTX 560Ti DCII OC | Corsair H80 Water Cooling
User avatar
JonARNZ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:49 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Auckland

Postby scon » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:19 pm

JonARNZ wrote: Yeah, the readme gives nothing away either...

Man do you have it already ( they are big flies )
scon
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 7:16 pm
Posts: 963
Location: NZ

Postby Zöltuger » Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:05 pm

anyone installed it yet?
Zöltuger
 

Postby Jimmy » Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:54 pm

hmmm, why make a mesh when the RBE one works great in fsx?

If they don't state the resolution then it can't be that great.. But big files? How big?

James
Jimmy
 

Postby ZK-Brock » Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:01 pm

Well, to be honest I'm not really sure how to work the RBE 75m mesh in FSX, with the resolution slider in there.
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby Zöltuger » Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:16 pm

I've got the RBE 75m mesh installed, so I've set my slider to 76m, looks pretty good.
Zöltuger
 

Postby JonARNZ » Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:10 pm

scon wrote:
JonARNZ wrote: Yeah, the readme gives nothing away either...

Man do you have it already ( they are big flies )

Yeah, all up about 300MB I think. No I dont have it yet, I used the view function on flightsim.com to see the files
Last edited by JonARNZ on Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ARNZX flightsim.co.nz
Asus Sabretooth X79 MB | i73930K CPU | 8GB DDR3 1600 C7 Ram | GTX 560Ti DCII OC | Corsair H80 Water Cooling
User avatar
JonARNZ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:49 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Auckland

Postby JonARNZ » Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:56 am

300 MB's later and I have some before and after shots. Befores show FSX default on maximum mesh settings. After show thefree mesh installed.

Mount cook looking towards the mountain

Before
user posted image

After
user posted image

Mount cook 45 degrees to the right of last shot, at altitude

Before
user posted image

After
user posted image

Milford Sound

Before
user posted image

After
user posted image

Some weird stuff going on in this part of the country :wacko:
ARNZX flightsim.co.nz
Asus Sabretooth X79 MB | i73930K CPU | 8GB DDR3 1600 C7 Ram | GTX 560Ti DCII OC | Corsair H80 Water Cooling
User avatar
JonARNZ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:49 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Auckland

Postby johanfrc » Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:01 am

I must say that I can't see why downloading 300 mb's will help? Millford looks a bit better, but not that "good".
Image
If God had really intended men to fly, he'd make it easier to get to the airport. - George Winters
johanfrc
Member
 
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:34 am
Posts: 149
Location: Denmark

Postby scon » Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:12 am

I have mine set at 76M at doing a flight from NZAA to NZWN in a 737 last night I didn't notice a difference.


How do you get the RBE mesh working in FSX and does anyone have a different landclass installed, I have a free one I found on the RBE site, ( would a LC affect how a mesh looks )
scon
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 7:16 pm
Posts: 963
Location: NZ

Postby ZK-Brock » Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:16 am

Also,could someone tell us what the approximate resolution of the default NZ mesh is?
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby Jimmy » Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:05 am

haha you sure you didn't just upload your before shot for the after one too Jon :lol: honestly I can't see a differance!

Not worth 300mbs at all!
Jimmy
 

Postby toprob » Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:06 am

FSX default mesh for NZ is based on SRTM 90 metre data, which for use in FS2004 was resampled to 76 metres. I assume the same applies for FSX. That's why to get the full effect of the default mesh you set your mesh to 76 metres.
Trying to increase the resolution by resampling is basically making up the intermediate detail, so really you are looking at a 90 metre resolution.
SRTM data for around Milford is damaged -- hence the huge rounded mountains, which I've always imagined are scans of clouds. Incidentally, you can fix the elevation to some degree by using a non-SRTM mesh such as Christian's, but the topo data (rivers etc) is kind of locked to the damaged data, so it will still display funny.
Christian's freeware 75 metre mesh is not based on SRTM data, so it doesn't have the messed-up Milford, and it is also resampled from much higher resolution data -- the same data which produced the 20 metre mesh (I assume) so it is inherently more accurate.
That's why Christian's freeware mesh will display better in FSX -- although since there are changes to the way mesh is created in FSX, it may or may not perform as well. What we really need is a 75 metre mesh recompiled for native FSX. However I don't notice any real performance hit from his 20 metre mesh in FSX.
It is possible these days to obtain SRTM data greater than 90 metre resolution, but I don't know if that is available for NZ, and I don't know if it is used in this new mesh. Looking at the Milford screenshot suggests that this is based on newer data.
User avatar
toprob
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:56 pm
Posts: 6711
Location: Upper Hutt

Postby Bingobob » Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:45 am

Not exactly the kind of thing I wanted to see to get me to change to FSX yet!

Can I also point out that SRTM stands for Shuttle Radar Topography Mission which means the same stuff we have now is the same as was around when Nasa flew the SRTM mission.
Bingobob
 

Postby Christian » Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:44 am

Robin explained it really well.

I wouldn't recommend the 300MB download. FSX is already using SRTM data and it looks to me that this 'new' mesh is also SRTM. Not much point. The only difference seems to be that the 'new' mesh is using an updated SRTM where the cloud cover is fixed. (Coincidentally, the people who supplied that fix to the SRTM people is GeographX.)

For Australia, it's probably very similar to what's in FSX already as well...

The freeware RBE is better because it's actual resolution is 76 m, not 90 m like the STRM. As Robin said, it's based on the same data as the 20m mesh.

How to install? Simple. If you only have FSX just run the installer. If you want to use it for FS9 and FSX, copy the Red Baron NZ mesh folder into Addon Scenery in FSX and add to the scenery library.

A fix for the muckup in Milford Sound also exists. I released a patch for the RBE topo a few weeks ago. If you own the topo, copy it across to FSX and install the patch and Milford Sound is fixed!

Cheers,
Christian
Breathtakingly gorgeous FS landscapes for New Zealand.
Visit Sim Pilot Experience now:
http://www.simpilotexperience.com
Follow me on twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/ChristianStock
User avatar
Christian
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:03 pm
Posts: 426
Location: melbourne

Postby Timmo » Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:07 pm

Measured around Whakatane, Default FSX data is 0.000915 decimal degrees which works out to about 100m

Im not sure how variable this is around the country though
Timmo
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:28 pm
Posts: 2056
Location: Tauranga

Postby JonARNZ » Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:53 pm

Jimmy wrote: haha you sure you didn't just upload your before shot for the after one too Jon :lol: honestly I can't see a differance!

Not worth 300mbs at all!

Thanks for that Jimmy. If you look more closely, but take your glasses off because it seems your only looking through one eye, you will see quite a difference, particularly in the last shot in Milford.

The question is, is it enough for people to download? Thats up to them to decide, at least now they can see a comparison, surely thats a good thing?
ARNZX flightsim.co.nz
Asus Sabretooth X79 MB | i73930K CPU | 8GB DDR3 1600 C7 Ram | GTX 560Ti DCII OC | Corsair H80 Water Cooling
User avatar
JonARNZ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:49 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Auckland

Next

Return to Scenery

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests