Whats Your Style

A place to converse about the general aspects of flight simulation in New Zealand

Postby ardypilot » Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:59 pm

What is your favoured style of flying?

Which do you prefer the most:

VFR (Visual Flight Rules) cruising low and slow and enjoying the scenery

or

IFR (Instrument Flight Rules) soaring high and fast in the heavy metal aircraft
Last edited by ardypilot on Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby Jimmy » Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:08 pm

IFR for me of course! :D

I do enjoy the vfr very much but can't realy enjoy it properly on such a low end system.

But deffinitly te big iron for me lol FL390 in a 767 watching a sunset ahhhhhhhhh :P
Last edited by Jimmy on Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jimmy
 

Postby omitchell » Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:18 pm

IFR - If it aint got big engines, I don't fly it :)
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby creator2003 » Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:23 pm

:D low and slow to take in all the great eyecandy B)
creator2003
 

Postby bardos » Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:10 pm

I have a low end system too (waiting for FSX and a new one.)
But low and slow in an older aircraft in a nice scenery......
It's such a big world: you can spent years, this way.
Last edited by bardos on Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bardos
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:19 am
Posts: 152
Location: N52.58.29 E06.50.37 The Netherlands

Postby Alex » Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:15 pm

Well I like a bit of both, it depends what sort of day its been. If its been a horrible day and I've managed to pick up 5 different assignments I like to slow down and relax in a nice VFR aircraft, and if its been a slow day I don't mind keeping to schedules and feeling a little important :P .

Alex
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby FlyingKiwi » Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:47 pm

Well, both really, but probably IFR slightly moreso.
User avatar
FlyingKiwi
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 1688
Location: Auckland

Postby Muppet » Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:18 pm

Pretty 50-50 here too. Both give me a lot of enjoyment, and frustration I guess :lol:
Last edited by Muppet on Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Muppet
Member
 
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:38 am
Posts: 124
Location: NZQN

Postby Codge » Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:03 pm

With the 20m & topo low and slow(under 200KIAS) in a 737 is fun as you get to see how slow can you fly the "big iron" without falling out of the sky. Good power on tap to get to a different area quickly (without cheating) and the challenging landings that only the big jets offer. I like the Helos for the same reason-But even a C172 with some decent weather like a 20 knot crosswind can certainly be a workout too. I think that is the best thing about FS that it caters for all the different preferences,even boats and cars!

2 wrongs don't make a right but 2 Wrights made an aeroplane!
Last edited by Codge on Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 wrongs don't make a right but 2 Wrights made an aeroplane!
User avatar
Codge
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:04 pm
Posts: 355
Location: Dunedin

Postby Zöltuger » Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:11 pm

Codge wrote: 2 wrongs don't make a right but 2 Wrights made an aeroplane!

yeah, but richard pierce does it first <_<
Zöltuger
 

Postby SUBS17 » Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:12 pm

Low and fast for me :D both VFR and IFR(using TFR)
User avatar
SUBS17
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:16 am
Posts: 1745

Postby Ian Warren » Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:26 pm

SUBS .. yeah turn and burn and SONIC! :D
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby brownbox » Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:33 pm

with my pc, flying low is depressing sometimes :rolleyes:
Desktop:Core 2 Duo E4300 1.8@ 3.0Ghz@ 1.36v. 4Gb Supertalent DDR2-800 2.1v@ 5-5-5-15. Asus P5N-E SLI Pencil Modded. Corsair TX 650. 512MB Palit Geforce 8800GT. 2x200GB IDE+640GB SATAII. Windows Vista Ultimate X86. Samsung SH-S222A
Phone:Nokia N900 Vodafone
Car: 1993 Mitsubishi Mirage Asti Z. Steel Blue Pearl

1996 Toyota Curren 2.0L 5 Spd Manual Silver. 205/50/R16 on Enkei K-95. Lowered on Jamex Superlows. Remote locking. Remote boot release. Cruise control
1996 Mitsubishi GTO MR

Image
User avatar
brownbox
Senior Member
 
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:55 pm
Posts: 1318

Postby Cbris » Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:37 pm

Two engines is really one to many...

A paraffin burner is what you heat hangars with...

If God had meant us to fly planes with flat engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made em that way...

If you aren't picking grass out of your undercarrieage after landing, you were too high...

You got to get down amongst the scenery to enjoy it...

Screenie - Hamburg Germany - anti-glare shields over the approach road parallel to runway 33 / 15 (so that landing planes aren't blinded by car headlights.

user posted image

See a bridge or a structure with a gap - fly under it!

user posted image

Or even fly lower

user posted image
Chris Brisland a.k.a. 'EagleSkinner' or 'Dances with Paintbrushes'

Visit my site below (Click the pic) for all my latest FSX paints and much more

Image

Drop by my blog sometime

[url=http://www.facebook.com/christopher.brisland?ref=name#!/pages/Eagleskinner/119483578109942]Follow me on Facebook too[/url]
User avatar
Cbris
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 399
Location: EGNE - well, 7 1/2 miles from threshhold of 03

Postby SUBS17 » Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:00 pm

Low
user posted image

lower

user posted image

user posted image
User avatar
SUBS17
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:16 am
Posts: 1745

Postby SUBS17 » Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:01 pm

ok a little too low
user posted image

user posted image

IFR using TFR(Terrain Following Radar)
user posted image
Last edited by SUBS17 on Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SUBS17
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:16 am
Posts: 1745

Postby SUBS17 » Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:06 pm

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
User avatar
SUBS17
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:16 am
Posts: 1745

Postby creator2003 » Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:03 am

i havent had a laugh like this all week :lol: man you subs17 and cbris fly like me under and over what runway in that first shot lol subs made me go out for a flight ,,,,yes guys in a fixwing doing all the tricks smoke on what fun im having at 2 am in the morning ;)
movie time again hehehehehe keep it up id say but in this case keep it lower
mike :lol:
creator2003
 

Postby brownbox » Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:03 am

subs17 is that fs2004?
Desktop:Core 2 Duo E4300 1.8@ 3.0Ghz@ 1.36v. 4Gb Supertalent DDR2-800 2.1v@ 5-5-5-15. Asus P5N-E SLI Pencil Modded. Corsair TX 650. 512MB Palit Geforce 8800GT. 2x200GB IDE+640GB SATAII. Windows Vista Ultimate X86. Samsung SH-S222A
Phone:Nokia N900 Vodafone
Car: 1993 Mitsubishi Mirage Asti Z. Steel Blue Pearl

1996 Toyota Curren 2.0L 5 Spd Manual Silver. 205/50/R16 on Enkei K-95. Lowered on Jamex Superlows. Remote locking. Remote boot release. Cruise control
1996 Mitsubishi GTO MR

Image
User avatar
brownbox
Senior Member
 
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:55 pm
Posts: 1318

Postby SUBS17 » Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:50 pm

No thats lockon and Falcon 4 Allied Forces, FSX might be closer to lockons graphics hopefully with the civ traffic(auto trains and car traffic).
User avatar
SUBS17
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:16 am
Posts: 1745

Next

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests