Thinking of moving from 2D to VC

The place to ask for help or solve each others technical issues and discuss hardware

Postby kiwicomm » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:17 pm

Hi all,
I am very happy with FS2004. I fly with 2D panels. I've been thinking of giving VC flying a serious 'go'. Can anyone direct me to a primer on this, or general intro? For instance do I need to get Track IR or something like that to use it effectively? Is there a way to change views? At the moment I get one view and move within the view using only the hat control on my joystick. Simple questions like that. Thx for any info.
kiwicomm
Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:47 am
Posts: 32

Postby Ian Warren » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:33 pm

Back in the loop KComm for a VC, for an intro if your still using FS9/2004 , my recommendation would be a Milton Shupe Dash7 for example - the team has done plenty of other great aircraft , the most recent the Ventura , this will get you started http://www.sim-outhouse.com/sohforums/loca...age=3&pp=20 , course has a NZ 1980s Newman's paint in further search's .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby cowpatz » Thu Aug 07, 2014 5:12 pm

Try F1 View. Its a simple and free program. You will need a mouse with a scroll wheel (don't they all have that now?). Press and hold the designated mouse button and move your view around and zoom in and out with the wheel. It will become one of your favourite programs. I have TrackIR 5 but rarely use it. I dont like having to wear the thing on my head for starters (should at least be bluetooth by now as well) as well as the exaggerated head movements required. You will find reading the gauges more difficult in the VC and having to move to some odd angles will be required to activate switcheson overhead panels etc and you may not be able to read the switch labels clearly. Good aircraft to look for are those that have pop up mini panels. These are great and can be undocked and used on a second monitor.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby omitchell » Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:02 pm

I too have recently made the switch from 2d to 3d (After what? 16yrs in the seat) and it definitely does improve things. Not sure what you mean by one view tho? you should have full 360 motion and be able to hold the view when you release the hat. Definitely try cowpatz suggestion of F1 view and maybe later down the track EzDok (payware about US$35))
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby kiwicomm » Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:19 pm

oh wow that FI view is amazing, just what I needed to get going. Thanks everyone. I just tried it with a Zinertek VC addon for the LevelD767 (which prompted the initial enquiry about VCs) and boy does it look great! That FI 'hold the mouse wheel and move around' is invaluable. I also use the IFLy 737 and Flight 1 ATR and I'm confident that they will look great too. So thanks again.
kiwicomm
Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:47 am
Posts: 32

Postby jpreou » Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:25 pm

I doubt I will ever fly with TrackIR again, unless I am forced to
--
Jeff, ChCh, NZ
jpreou
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 734
Location: Redwood, Christchurch, NZ

Postby dbcunnz » Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:21 pm

Will the F1 View work with FSX????
Image
User avatar
dbcunnz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:56 pm
Posts: 4009
Location: Blenheim New Zealand

Postby Kamoflarj » Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:24 pm

jpreou wrote:
QUOTE (jpreou @ Aug 7 2014,6:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I doubt I will ever fly with TrackIR again, unless I am forced to


Is it really that bad? I wanted to use it for airliners mainly. One thing that concerned me is that I would be facing upwards, while looking down at the screen when using Overhead panels etc
Kamoflarj
Member
 
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:47 pm
Posts: 106

Postby omitchell » Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:24 pm

kiwicomm wrote:
QUOTE (kiwicomm @ Aug 7 2014,6:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
oh wow that FI view is amazing, just what I needed to get going. Thanks everyone. I just tried it with a Zinertek VC addon for the LevelD767 (which prompted the initial enquiry about VCs) and boy does it look great! That FI 'hold the mouse wheel and move around' is invaluable. I also use the IFLy 737 and Flight 1 ATR and I'm confident that they will look great too. So thanks again.


Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby cowpatz » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:54 pm

dbcunnz wrote:
QUOTE (dbcunnz @ Aug 7 2014,9:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Will the F1 View work with FSX????


Unfortunately not.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby cowpatz » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:03 pm

kiwicomm wrote:
QUOTE (kiwicomm @ Aug 7 2014,6:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
oh wow that FI view is amazing, just what I needed to get going. Thanks everyone. I just tried it with a Zinertek VC addon for the LevelD767 (which prompted the initial enquiry about VCs) and boy does it look great! That FI 'hold the mouse wheel and move around' is invaluable. I also use the IFLy 737 and Flight 1 ATR and I'm confident that they will look great too. So thanks again.


It works very well with the iFly 737. Use Shift + Enter to raise your eye height and Shift + Backspace to lower it. Using the mouse wheel you can move in and out. You can use this method to set up a really nice landing position so that you get a good view of the flight instruments and can just see the LH Engine instruments on the EICAS screen as well as a good view of the runway. I mainly use the 2D panels for setting everything up and the takeoff etc and maybe the VC in a bit of the cruise. 2D for the descent and then switch to the VC view I described earlier for the final approach and landing.
You will find that manipulating things like the FMC and even various autopilots are better with pop ups or 2D panels.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby deeknow » Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:00 pm

Kamoflarj wrote:
QUOTE (Kamoflarj @ Aug 7 2014,9:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Is it really that bad? I wanted to use it for airliners mainly. One thing that concerned me is that I would be facing upwards, while looking down at the screen when using Overhead panels etc

TrackIR is awesome, a little pricey especially the active version with the transmitter and receiver getup, but worth the extra $$$. I'm only a recent convert to VC as well after being a die-hard 2D fan but TrackIR has made that transition much easier.
I mainly fly airliners but TrackIR is amazingly cool in GA, gliders, anything low-and-slow or with a decent cockpit view.
Deans repaints: http://www.deeknow.com/
X570 Mini-ITX m/b - Ryzen7 5700X3D (8c/16t) - RTX 2060-super - 32GB 3600MHz DDR4 - Win10 - P3Dv5.3
User avatar
deeknow
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:15 pm
Posts: 4448
Location: NZHN

Postby Ian Warren » Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:44 pm

Like all above , simply it really adds a dimension !
Kamoflarj wrote:
QUOTE (Kamoflarj @ Aug 7 2014,10:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Is it really that bad? I wanted to use it for airliners mainly. One thing that concerned me is that I would be facing upwards, while looking down at the screen when using Overhead panels etc

So good as it is, 'I can personally say it puts my head in a spin' , not just for FS , so many other gaming programs, going back to FS supremely ideal for Helicopters.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby FunkymonkeyNZ » Sat Aug 09, 2014 6:05 pm

jpreou wrote:
QUOTE (jpreou @ Aug 7 2014,6:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I doubt I will ever fly with TrackIR again, unless I am forced to


On that note. Is anyone willing to let go of their TrackIR? ive had the 4 for years now but wondered how good the 5 was.
Chris Maher
Image
NZ CPL(A)+MEIR, NZNV,
User avatar
FunkymonkeyNZ
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:18 pm
Posts: 220
Location: Invercargill

Postby Fozzer » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:01 pm

I must admit that I have a great affection for 2D Panels... biggrin.gif ...!

It might not be "realistic"...but...

(a) It enables me to view the whole of the Instrument Panel in great detail without scrolling around.
(b) It enables me to modify the Instrument Panel layout to my own liking, with the aid of my "FS Panel Studio".

My "flights" are mostly for scenery exploration only, often with very little regard for aircraft accuracy.... winkyy.gif ...!

So 2D suits me nicely!... smile.gif ...!

Paul....in glorious 2D.... rolleyes.gif ...!
Paul Fosbery.

Windows 11. HP Vitus 15L Ryzen Desktop Gaming Computer + BenQ 24-inch Gaming Monitor. Thrustmaster T Flight Stick X.

A few tasty Motorbikes!
OnlineUser avatar
Fozzer
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:29 pm
Posts: 2427
Location: Hereford, Herefordshire, England

Postby emfrat » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:18 pm

About ten years back, I bought Track IR, and a thing with a name like 'Voice Buddy' and headphones to work with it, and some clever electronic glasses which provided a 3D view.
I liked TIR, but at that time there were not many good VCs around, although there are lots now. It was great for judging the turning points in a circuit, but it was very easy to become disorientated because there was no peripheral vision - and letting go with a big sneeze on short final could wreak all sorts of havoc.
The voice thing was good, but it was just too much trouble to teach it to understand my accent. It was a very good headset, but when combined with the pointy hat and the glasses it made me feel such an idiot that I soon abandoned them.
As for the glasses, they did provide 3D but only in every second line on the screen. After much hunting around the 'Net, I found that they relied on a function which was available in Nvidia cards, but not in Radeons, which I have always used. They could have mentioned that in their sales blurb.

My ideal now is either a Quintuple Head-to-Go, or maybe two Triple Heads-to-Go, when I can afford a machine to run them. Perfection would be one of those flexible plastic screens, about 12 x 2m, which I could wrap around to get peripheral vision, which would let me see just when I "get into the saucer" , which is when you start the flare.
One day... rolleyes.gif
MikeW
'Propliner' is actually short for 'Proper airliner, with big rumbly radials'

Image
User avatar
emfrat
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 7:41 pm
Posts: 4098
Location: 50 DME YBBN

Postby Kamoflarj » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:48 pm

emfrat wrote:
QUOTE (emfrat @ Aug 9 2014,7:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
About ten years back, I bought Track IR, and a thing with a name like 'Voice Buddy' and headphones to work with it, and some clever electronic glasses which provided a 3D view.
I liked TIR, but at that time there were not many good VCs around, although there are lots now. It was great for judging the turning points in a circuit, but it was very easy to become disorientated because there was no peripheral vision - and letting go with a big sneeze on short final could wreak all sorts of havoc.
The voice thing was good, but it was just too much trouble to teach it to understand my accent. It was a very good headset, but when combined with the pointy hat and the glasses it made me feel such an idiot that I soon abandoned them.
As for the glasses, they did provide 3D but only in every second line on the screen. After much hunting around the 'Net, I found that they relied on a function which was available in Nvidia cards, but not in Radeons, which I have always used. They could have mentioned that in their sales blurb.

My ideal now is either a Quintuple Head-to-Go, or maybe two Triple Heads-to-Go, when I can afford a machine to run them. Perfection would be one of those flexible plastic screens, about 12 x 2m, which I could wrap around to get peripheral vision, which would let me see just when I "get into the saucer" , which is when you start the flare.
One day... rolleyes.gif


INSPIRING
Kamoflarj
Member
 
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:47 pm
Posts: 106

Postby emfrat » Sat Aug 09, 2014 8:03 pm

Kamoflarj wrote:
QUOTE (Kamoflarj @ Aug 9 2014,5:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
INSPIRING


I've been waiting a long time drool.gif

http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/hometec...0713-zt6d9.html
MikeW
'Propliner' is actually short for 'Proper airliner, with big rumbly radials'

Image
User avatar
emfrat
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 7:41 pm
Posts: 4098
Location: 50 DME YBBN

Postby FunkymonkeyNZ » Sat Aug 09, 2014 8:23 pm

If i had the cash id drop TrackIR all together and go back to 2D panels tongue.gif And add one of these 'Cobra Screens to go with it'



Chris Maher
Image
NZ CPL(A)+MEIR, NZNV,
User avatar
FunkymonkeyNZ
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:18 pm
Posts: 220
Location: Invercargill

Postby cowpatz » Sat Aug 09, 2014 9:33 pm

That is probably it in a nutshell. Track IR is good for viewing outside but not really that flash inside...too much craning of the neck.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Next

Return to Technical Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests