100% ad-free
Nzeddy wrote:QUOTE (Nzeddy @ Nov 28 2012,5:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Satellite? Space Station?
Yea I was thinking something along those lines.....
Id Ignore the video at the top too not sure if its actually anything to do with the story...
Only thing though the spacestation dont stick around long....
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Nov 29 2012,11:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>funny reading it lasted for thirty seconds yet the Vid is five minutes
Yea I have a feeling that video had nothing to do with the article expect for the glowing part.... haha
SA227 wrote:QUOTE (SA227 @ Nov 29 2012,4:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Hey Ian, remind me one day to tell you about the light south of Oamaru, that was spooky
Ooo Ooo ! Reminder .... how bout now
.. I did have a book on UFO encounters , one i handed out and never got back but fact is they are more common than most believe
SUBS17 wrote:QUOTE (SUBS17 @ Dec 13 2012,3:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>More UFO stuff.
http://screen.yahoo.com/strange-lights-app...-233018377.html
Same thing happened in the 1950s, but I think these might be man made.
SUBS .... No disrespect to you at all .... but that is a load of horse s**t ....
SUBS17 wrote:QUOTE (SUBS17 @ Jan 4 2013,4:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>so long as its not in the wrong hands and used the wrong way and it is necessary because there are countrys that are catching up with the US in some of the high technology that is used for stealth fighters and weapons
Ah, there's the million dollar question - whose hands are the wrong ones? There was a time when I believed that it was basically the hands of anybody in "the west". I've been disabused of that notion for some time now.
You're right that there is quite a pile of misinformation, disinformation and outright lies to wade through - after 20 years of looking into the subject I've learned that. At the same time, providing one has an inquisitive mind, a willingness to conscience the "unlikely" (according to "standard" everyday people's way of thinking) and to have a world view that takes in much more than the 4 dimensions we can physically experience, it's quite possible to begin to patch together a tapestry of "gold nuggets" that, when viewed from a more all-encompassing "standing back to take in the whole big picture" stance, yields a very interesting pattern and method underlying it all.
I certainly wouldn't be relying on any government or military to tell the truth about what they've got, how they got it, who's helping them or why. It is frustrating that many people just like to label this stuff as "kooky", thereby effectively sticking their heads in the sand. I do understand that the ramifications of the truth of things is startling, in the least, but just because it is so challenging to everyday life & potentially a permanent game-changer for life on this planet in the intermediate future doesn't mean that people should just laugh & go back the "comforts" of what doesn't threaten them...Last edited by IslandBoy77 on Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SUBS17 wrote:QUOTE (SUBS17 @ Jan 4 2013,4:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Well with military test aircraft the pattern is generally the aircraft are kept secret until such time as they have something better and then they release some info on it. For example the F117 was around since the 70s but no knowledge was released officially by the US until the Gulf war
Was a press release of the F117 around 1987/88 and prior no across the board in defence magazines dating 1982 when one crashed in New Mexico , course you also had the plastic model people 'TESTORS' making what they thought what it was to look like and a flurry of publications drawing all sorts of different concepts .. Great days they were !
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests