

100% ad-free
cowpatz wrote:QUOTE (cowpatz @ Jul 26 2011,12:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Another "attractive" Russian aircraft....
I think it is....mind you, i also like the look of the Aitruk...but those Bears are real "manplanes" ...love them.
connor wrote:QUOTE (connor @ Jul 26 2011,5:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Ian, what's that about an An-22?
We have had many different Russian air-lifters , must be due for a AN-22 eight to nine weeks away .
Splitpin wrote:QUOTE (Splitpin @ Jul 26 2011,1:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I think it is....mind you, i also like the look of the Aitruk...but those Bears are real "manplanes" ...love them.
Manplane...that's the word!
There are other, similar things: 16lb hammer, for example
Picture is now my desktop.
I have a Kuznetsov sound loop which I sometimes play... oh dearLast edited by Charl on Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Charl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ Jul 27 2011,9:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>B-52 ain't much younger, or prettier...
Gog Dang it Charl!, the 52 is so pretty that if you took the make up off it still looks great! , the Bear a plane with warts , but i love em , the 52 .. the 'Kenworth of the Skies'
Last edited by Ian Warren on Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 27 2011,11:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Gog Dang it Charl!, the 52 is so pretty that if you took the make up off it still looks great! , the Bear a plane with warts , but i love em , the 52 .. the 'Kenworth of the Skies'
Um Ian, you do know what the "U" in BUFF is, don't you???
Fit for purpose... they'd have to be, to survive half a century in service.
Mean is the closest common denominator...
And CP, show us an ugly French plane, and I'll immediately raise you 3 beauts...
Marty has already fired the first shot, game over:
http://nzff.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15434&hl=Last edited by Charl on Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Charl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ Aug 1 2011,8:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>And CP, show us an ugly French plane, and I'll immediately raise you 3 beauts...
Marty has already fired the first shot, game over:
http://nzff.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15434&hl=
How about the Beluga and its daddy the A380 for starters.Last edited by cowpatz on Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Charl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ Jul 28 2011,1:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Ian, that is not strictly correct...
ShsssI had every one going there for a minute
Charl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ Aug 2 2011,12:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Ian, that is not strictly correct...
CP, despite what the French would have you believe, Airbus is owned by a Dutch-registered multinational company.
You want ugly?
Pshaw, here's some old-fashioned Boeing Fugly
Yeah but the 747 transporter aircraft is still sweet when compared to the gross and aptly named Beluga. It's a Boeing and they dont do uglyLast edited by cowpatz on Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
cowpatz wrote:QUOTE (cowpatz @ Jul 28 2011,8:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>It's a Boeing and they dont do ugly
And that,s without d,out , ... was going to say Brussel Sprout .. WOW too European for me , Belgium and Brussel Sprouts for dinner ,
cowpatz wrote:QUOTE (cowpatz @ Jul 27 2011,6:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>As I have said before " If it's ugly it's French, if it's weird it's British. If it's ugly and weird it's Russian"
That fuse is way too skinny !!!
The quote is the other way round isn't it? If it's ugly it's Brit, if it's werid it's Frog, but theres no despute about the Ruski.Takeoff's are optional. Landings are mandatory.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests