100% ad-free
spongebob206 wrote:QUOTE (spongebob206 @ Apr 11 2011,3:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Was tossing up between C206, C185F, seneca and the FSD Porter.
Would love the latter but unsure of quality.
Went with the online reviews.
depends on what you mean by "Quality" Do you just want to show it off in screenies, then yeah the up close quality is "so so"
If you want to fly a fantastic flight sim that is pretty darn close to the real thing, then the quality is brilliant.Regards always
Pete
creator2003 wrote:QUOTE (creator2003 @ Apr 14 2011,8:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>The 206 is awesome the 185f with tundra wheels is even better ,the VC on both are the same to me the interior on both are at the same standard ,the outside is just that the same awesome quality as the rest of the range they have on sale ,power 206 fun tail dragger the 185F is the way to go ..
the paint thing sounds like the cfg entry on the paints are incorrect which would mean they will not show make sure the numbers are right etc on the paint descriptions within the text entrys.
happy flying
Thanks Mike,
Will check again.
yes this 206 is awesome, Might get the seneca Next.Rotordude wrote:QUOTE (Rotordude @ Apr 13 2011,7:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>depends on what you mean by "Quality" Do you just want to show it off in screenies, then yeah the up close quality is "so so"
If you want to fly a fantastic flight sim that is pretty darn close to the real thing, then the quality is brilliant.
Sound awesome
Cheersscrubcutter wrote:QUOTE (scrubcutter @ Apr 13 2011,9:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Just got the Carenado B58. Takes their range to new heights (No pun intended!). Highly recommended, good looking model, and like their 185 and Caravan, class all the way
Thanks mate, Looking at this too
- spongebob206
- Senior Member
- Topic author
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:04 pm
- Posts: 1526
- Location: Wanganui
AndrewJamez wrote:QUOTE (AndrewJamez @ Apr 18 2011,9:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>You think the 206 is good, wait till you get there newer stuff. Go for the B58 over the Seneca, I agree with alot of views that the flight model is a bit quirky. It seems overly pitchy in elevator and just doesnt feel right. The baron58 is like the bonanza (also another great aircraft) just more engines and more speed.
Im still not sure about the seneca elevator. When flying the real seneca they are comparatively heavy to smaller single engines and taking the elevator to extremes potentially will give the same effect in the real plane as the carenado one. I think it might just be the lack of resistance on the simulator which makes it feel so overly powerful. Even still, having the simulator seneca 'stick' to the runway till 90 knots is just terribly wrong, the real one is more than happy to fly at 65 if you were not worried about having an engine fail on takeoff!
Another bug which is very very annoying in FSX turbo pistons with CSU is that the sound set almost always follows the manifold pressure rather than RPM. Mixture leaning is also tied to altitude rather than manifold pressure too so that means the mixture leaning is completely wrong - you shouldn't have to lean with altitude in a turbocharged engine unless you reach the altitude where turbos can no longer maintain their sea level manifold pressure.
Sorry for being off track!Cameron Morison
CAA CPL(A), MEIR
FSX Acceleration on windows 7 64bit, Gigabyte P55a-UD3R i5-750, 4GB DDR3, HD5850 1GB (and still sucky frames - thanks fsx!)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests