New to FSX

A forum specifically to discuss the latest and greatest of all flight simulators

Postby deeknow » Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:46 am

IslandBoy77 wrote:
QUOTE (IslandBoy77 @ Sep 28 2010, 08:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thanks - I appreciate that. I didn't want to link them to my FB either - don't want any old "hobble-de-hoy" having access to my FB stuff... winkyy.gif

Heh, but it's all right if Mat does it for you aye Islandboy winkyy.gif .. I was also wary of clicking the FB auth thing, was just reading it online.
Deans repaints: http://www.deeknow.com/
X570 Mini-ITX m/b - Ryzen7 5700X3D (8c/16t) - RTX 2060-super - 32GB 3600MHz DDR4 - Win10 - P3Dv5.3
User avatar
deeknow
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:15 pm
Posts: 4448
Location: NZHN

Postby IslandBoy77 » Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:08 pm

deeknow wrote:
QUOTE (deeknow @ Sep 28 2010, 12:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Heh, but it's all right if Mat does it for you aye Islandboy winkyy.gif .. I was also wary of clicking the FB auth thing, was just reading it online.

Yup! laugh.gif He was going to (and did) anyway, so why should we all give away personal info? tongue.gif
User avatar
IslandBoy77
Senior Member
 
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:23 pm
Posts: 1020
Location: Napier, New Zealand

Postby Nosecone » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:47 pm

Thanks Guys
Anyone know if a Core 2 duo quad would make any real difference over my current dual core

Rhys
User avatar
Nosecone
Forum Addict
 
Topic author
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:22 am
Posts: 234
Location: Upper Hutt

Postby IslandBoy77 » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:20 pm

Nosecone wrote:
QUOTE (Nosecone @ Sep 28 2010, 04:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thanks Guys
Anyone know if a Core 2 duo quad would make any real difference over my current dual core

Rhys

Yes, but primarily if it's clock speed is faster than the dual and it's Cache is bigger. Dual cores are pretty good, and I'm not certain that FSX really make much use of mutli-cores per se. I suppose an extra advantage of a Quad is that you can assign FSX is core 4, well out of the way of the "traffic area" of the 1st 2 cores (which tend to take most of the load). But it you're current dual is a grunter, you might have to spend a bit of dosh (and poss a new motherboard depending on age of current Dual) for a Quad - do some research 1st and see how much you're going to have to pay to go Quad vs poss benefit...
User avatar
IslandBoy77
Senior Member
 
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:23 pm
Posts: 1020
Location: Napier, New Zealand

Postby Nosecone » Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:40 pm

Thanks Islandboy77
The mobo is only a couple of months old. It replaced the original mobo that would crash due to overheating problems. The new mobo is Asus P5QPL-AM

Cheers

Rhys
User avatar
Nosecone
Forum Addict
 
Topic author
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:22 am
Posts: 234
Location: Upper Hutt

Postby AndrewJamez » Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:46 pm

Microsoft stated that FSX SP2 will use up to 256 cores. So it does make a difference but like Island boy suggested, clock speed is more important. A moderately clocked dual core will prob still be quicker than the equivalent stock speed quad.
AndrewJamez
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:04 pm
Posts: 766
Location: Hamilton

Postby Nosecone » Mon Oct 04, 2010 8:02 am

Thanks Guys

I am going to re-install FSX and acceleration. I don't have any addons so I'm running FSX default. With sliders set to about half, no water ,no light bloom, cockpit detail low clouds off, antialiasing ticked in the sim, screen res set to 1600x1200-32 traffic set to about 20%, my flight starts of at about 20fps then slow to about 5fps and goes up to may be between 12-20 and that's the default free flight with the microlight.

Rhys
User avatar
Nosecone
Forum Addict
 
Topic author
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:22 am
Posts: 234
Location: Upper Hutt

Previous

Return to All Flight Simulators

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests