






It is very expensive , i'll keep you posted
100% ad-free
Splitpin wrote:QUOTE (Splitpin @ Aug 18 2010, 08:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>..but i need to re-activate it....and Im having a few problems with their support site.....I'll keep at it.
Be interesting to compared the FS9 model , the cockpit has had a make over , Looks goodCharl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ Aug 18 2010, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I have this 707 somewhere but can't recall: did capsim do an AWACS of it?
AWACS , Charl indeed they did for the FS9 package and few other variants .
Tyre,s and the fuel bill ... bill .... bill ...... Bill Gates .. don,t spose you want to help with the fuel bill and ... Bill ... bill .. billLast edited by Ian Warren on Wed Aug 18, 2010 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ian Warren- NZFF Pro
- Topic author
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
- Posts: 41187
- Location: AREA 51
Albatross wrote:QUOTE (Albatross @ Aug 18 2010, 09:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Good luck coming to a stop at Wellington!(hence the tyre joke maybe lol)
Nice pics Ian.
No nothing wrong with the tyres its just a pothole in the runway
Naki wrote:QUOTE (Naki @ Aug 18 2010, 11:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>..very expensive too
Yeah your right Paul ! .. first release is only this aircraft , typical off all CaptSim , they always have been top dollar , updates are incoming , i do have to reinstall the FS9 to compare , i will keep and post screens .







Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Aug 19 2010, 04:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>- Braniff
- Equatoriana
Now THERE'S 2 names I haven't seen in a while! When my Dad was stationed as a missionary in Ecuador for 2.5 years, he took the family with him (a great experience for an 11 year old!) back in 1979 - we came into Quito (pronounced Key-tow for those who may wonder) in an Ecuatoriana 707 - the old "paisley power" design, before they went across to the all-gold one (haven't seen their latest). And Braniff was the butt of many a joke - the local Yanks (of whom there were quite a number in Quito) referred to it them as "The Grand IF" - apparently Braniff were shoddy and very unreliable (not that our flight home in 1981 on a Pan Am 747 Clipper was much chop - leaking air con, flickering lights - what a disgrace!).
Actually, I have a great flying story about Braniff. For those who don't know, the city of Quito is situated at 10,000 feet (which means so is the airport...). I don't remember the length of the runway, but I think it was between 2 and 3 miles. Despite having a very long runway (which one couldn't see the other end of from the ground due to the curvature of the earth), pilots were still wise to land as close to the threshold as possible without taking the undercarriage off on the perimeter fence.So one day, just before we arrived, this Braniff jock decides he's going to touch down about 1/3rd down the runway. All the friends and family are waving and such as the 707 hurtles past. And keeps going. And keeps going. It winds up running off the end of the runway, down into the hollow before the northern perimeter fence and breaking the front nose gear. So there sits the 707, butt end pointing decidedly skywards, but otherwise intact. And the only injury? A retired pilot who thought the thing was going to blow (and with Braniff, that was always a possibility!). So he pops the back door and jumps - forgetting that with the poor old 707's posterior pointing "up", that he's now got a 20-30 foot gap between him and terra firma. He broke his leg.
It was always interesting watching the heavies landing and taking off from Quito - we were about 2km as the crow flies from the airport, and we could nearly always hear the massive roar of the reverse thrust on the 707's & 747's that landed there many times each day. But better, south-departing aircraft used to skim out over the west along the flank of Mt Pichincha (Pi-cheen-cha, with the "Pi" pronounced like in "pip") - I could almost count the rivets on the underside they were so low. Of course, an 11-year olds perspective of "low" and what is really low will vary, but they were low enough so that the whole house shook and we had to yell at each other to be heard over the roar! Of course with the thin air, full load and such, the departing aircraft were definitely "balls to the wall" to even get airborne, let alone be at a safe, NZ-respectable height whilst passing over our house.Last edited by IslandBoy77 on Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests