Ian Warren wrote:Be the question ill ask for you , Its amazing how one raid has so much interest 67 years later .
Thanks, that will be interesting.
Yes that raid has always generated interest, its probably the greatest show of flying skills from WW2 at least. We also know a modern group of jet flyers failed the test in a giant simulator 5 or so years ago.
In the flight sim context its been popular as well. Over 3000 downloads in CFS1, in excess of 5000 in FS2002 and 18817 in FS2004. There are 11797 simmers (since November last) with the up dated Plane-Design Lancaster that maybe Ed might be sorry he gave permission for me to use.
There has been quite a lot of feed back, mainly that simmers find it all too hard and taxing and simply revert to flying the Lancaster at altitude and really thats not a
Tribute to their skills. In the period up to the raid they never flew above +1500 feet.
I was also suprised to find so many do not use flight plans which in the case of the Operation Ready version is necessary to set the aircraft up properly and to fly the approximate route and then find the dams. At tree top level you cannot navigate very well.
There are no other Lancasters in the sim world that you can fly the Dambuster wall attacks because they all lack the necessary Dambuster tools to fly at "+60 feet". They just look like the aircraft - big difference and for obvious reasons mine are not anything like the reality of 1943. In a sim they cannot be.
FINALLY: I am amazed really that the so called experts, after 65-67 years, have decided the right hand turn at the Moehne dam was not used. Instead the straight in approach that I first used in CFS1 is said to be it (that seemed obvious from a study of maps). Hell of a lot of museums etc have got it wrong now, including our National in Canberra.
It shows how little is known about some aspects of the raid. Amazing, was it not documented? How good was the debrief (10 questions)? In Gibson's debrief he says he could see the target from 3-4 miles out. No question asked "where did it hit the wall? The straight in run is supported by the fact that no Lancaster repeated an attack at the Moehne. Very different to the difficult EDER and Sorpe.
If the "straight in" attack route was used how come one "bomb" landed by the left tower. How could you be 110 yards out on a straight run in? For heavens sake, these were the best bomber crews in Bomber Command. Not even in a sim is that possible. But the right turn could throw a bomb well off line if released whilst still on the turn. Common outcome in the sim, particularly FSX with at least 130 yards of water missing. l doubt if Mr Munro would have/remember the answers.
If you view the slow motion clip of a bomb drop in my film, one could ask "how did bombs go over or hit the parapet. - too fast, too high, too late.
I think its quite interesting that those that did make it to the Sorpe dam (3 Lancasters) made a total of 30 (thirty) runs to drop 3 weapons. Can you imagine what the crew members were thinking after 9 tries?
Oh yes it is an interesting subject to ponder if your interested in sim flying and really want to understand the aircraft your flying.
Cheers