http://www.3news.co.nz/Video/Pirates-hijac...video?_cobr=MSN
100% ad-free
waka172rg wrote:QUOTE (waka172rg @ Nov 23 2008, 11:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>armed forces let loose i say!
Couldnt agree with you more mateDesktop:Core 2 Duo E4300 1.8@ 3.0Ghz@ 1.36v. 4Gb Supertalent DDR2-800 2.1v@ 5-5-5-15. Asus P5N-E SLI Pencil Modded. Corsair TX 650. 512MB Palit Geforce 8800GT. 2x200GB IDE+640GB SATAII. Windows Vista Ultimate X86. Samsung SH-S222A
Phone:Nokia N900 Vodafone
Car:1993 Mitsubishi Mirage Asti Z. Steel Blue Pearl
1996 Toyota Curren 2.0L 5 Spd Manual Silver. 205/50/R16 on Enkei K-95. Lowered on Jamex Superlows. Remote locking. Remote boot release. Cruise control
1996 Mitsubishi GTO MR

Bazza wrote:QUOTE (Bazza @ Nov 19 2008, 08:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>That was my thought too until I saw the expert on TV1 news tonight explaining how it all works. It appears the "Baddies" will ask for
$50 million, the shipowners negotiating team will get it back to about $2 million and get their boat and crew back.
Fat Cat games...?
yeh but i wouldn't trust them as far as i could throw them! look what these people did to Sir Pete Blake![]()
![]()
do these people negotiate with terrorists?
waka172rg wrote:QUOTE (waka172rg @ Nov 20 2008, 01:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>do these people negotiate with terrorists?
These aren't terrorists; there is a big difference between a hijacking and terrorism. No ulterior motive here - just in it for the cash.
ZK-Brock wrote:QUOTE (ZK-Brock @ Nov 24 2008, 08:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Makes you wonder why they wouldn't have armed guards on board, considering they had $180 mil worth of cargo!
They're supposed to have armed guards but obviously either they didn't bother to man their look outs or they were overwelmed by supperior fire power which seems quite likely. IMO the oil will probably go well with the Russian armour they captured a few weeks ago BTW yesterday they captured another ship.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests