New Skies & Clouds

A forum specifically to discuss the latest and greatest of all flight simulators

Postby happytraveller » Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:29 am

I was searching for some new clouds and skies to install on the FSX and found that there is something coming out shortly that might interest others:-

http://www.realenvironmentxtreme.com/

Not available yet, but the preview shots look very impressive, so I will be waiting for this one.

Smooth landings!!!
happytraveller
Senior Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 1109

Postby FlyingKiwi » Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:18 am

The screenshots look very promising, wonder what effect it will have on performance though?
User avatar
FlyingKiwi
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 1688
Location: Auckland

Postby towerguy » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:55 am

am thinking about the latest ActiveskyX - any thoughts or experiences anyone?
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby Kea » Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:24 pm

In my opinion Active Sky X (and X Graphics, because you should probably get them both) is a darn sight better than the default weather. The only problem with Active Sky is that it's best used in it's real-weather mode (real-time weather), which is fine if you're an all-weather pilot. If you've got X Graphics though, you don't have to run Active Sky all the time (just for when you want that truly authentic flight), and can stick to the FSX weather themes or user-defined weather and the sky/cloud graphics in X Graphics are still heaps better than the default. This Real Environment looks very similar to Active Sky, perhaps just a touch better.
That's what I reckon.
Kea
Member
 
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:04 pm
Posts: 76

Postby dharris » Fri Mar 07, 2008 4:28 am

Kea wrote:
QUOTE (Kea @ Jan 20 2008, 07:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
In my opinion Active Sky X (and X Graphics, because you should probably get them both) is a darn sight better than the default weather. The only problem with Active Sky is that it's best used in it's real-weather mode (real-time weather), which is fine if you're an all-weather pilot. If you've got X Graphics though, you don't have to run Active Sky all the time (just for when you want that truly authentic flight), and can stick to the FSX weather themes or user-defined weather and the sky/cloud graphics in X Graphics are still heaps better than the default. This Real Environment looks very similar to Active Sky, perhaps just a touch better.
That's what I reckon.



I have been using Flight Environment X for a few months now and it looks great. http://www.flight1.com/products.asp?product=flt1fex
Pure Connie Flyer

Gigabyte EP45-UD3R, Intel Core2Duo 333 MHZ E8600 Xigmatek HDT-S1283 CPU Cooler
6 GB G-Skill F2-8500CL5 5-5-5-15, EVGA GTX 260
Antec 750 w bronze power supply, RaidMax Smilodon case with 3 fans
WD Veloraptor drive 150gb for FSX alone. 2 Seagate 160gb and one 320gb drive
1- 500 gb Seagate drive for WinXP 7 64 bit Home Professional
User avatar
dharris
Member
 
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 4:43 am
Posts: 92
Location: Michigan , USA

Postby s0cks » Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:10 am

Wow! Looks intense. When I get FSX I now have to descide on ASX or REX :/ AS6 has always been a reliable friend for me.
s0cks
 


Return to All Flight Simulators

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests