Brennanx wrote: But still some ATC people make mistakes.
As do some pilots
100% ad-free
kiwiflyboy wrote: I object to everyone saying it was a balls up by ATC, it was probably a good idea to put the 172 first, remembering that the 172, doesn't need to use full length, the 747 will, also the taxi speeds wont vary too much, and having the 172 take off first, means that no aircraft will have to be sittting on the ground due to wake turbulence....
towerguy wrote: amazing how even you "wanna be" pilots automatically assume its "cr@p planning" by ATC - how about the Dumbass cessna pilot that took the wrong taxiway or the poor cessna pilot that got a brake lockup or something -Oh NOOOO its cr@p planning by ATC - I can't wait until I have you sitting in the controllers seat and I am your instructor - then we will see what real stress and sweat is! you pilots see your own aeroplane and maybe one or two others and hear one or two frequencies - try sitting in a control room or tower some time listening to multiple radios running dozens of aircraft on split frequencies all saying "we can make number one" usually while we are short staffed, the weather is cr@p , half the taxiways are blocked off, management wants you to move double the number of aircraft while putting more restrictions on what you can and cannot say or do - all the time trying to get you all in and out as quickly and easily as possible with as little hassle as we can. Do it day in and day out for year after year and what will you get - "cr@p planning by ATC" but make one questionable move and it's 'oh yeah ATC ballsed it up-again!" well next time you fly and I recognise the voice you had better be holding 210% route fuel and Island holding reserve and don't forget to double check that route MSA and the 25nm min alt - you never know I might make a cr@p decision - involving a bl@@dy great hill!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
towerguy wrote: underworked money grabbing primadonnas that could be replaced by a suitably trained monkey with the right machine.
Sure you don't want littlies flying into wake turbulence, but think of the cost of holding up a Jumbo?
one final example - very recently a pilot of a heavy flying a particularly low approach to the displaced threshold 23L rang to complain that the Papis needed calibrating because they all showed red! - Duh!? and that is the honest to goodness truth!




towerguy wrote: okay charl that sounds like a good idea - it may take a month or so (or more) to put it all together as I am also trying to fit in a trip around the world at the same time as actually going to work and talk to these aeroplanes - an overall summary of ATC as it's supposed to be and what it's really like.![]()
scon wrote: Ahhhh the joys of flying out of Ardmore![]()
everyone screaming down 118.1 at each other as the Ardmore Flying School guys try to replicate top gun and break the 250kt speed restriction in there 172's![]()
kiwiflyboy wrote:scon wrote: Ahhhh the joys of flying out of Ardmore![]()
everyone screaming down 118.1 at each other as the Ardmore Flying School guys try to replicate top gun and break the 250kt speed restriction in there 172's![]()
Lord only knows how many times, i have selected flap in the downwind and slowed down to accommodate for other aircraft in the circuit.... I think you will find the majority of AFS people (who actually continue past a PPL) are very decent people.
Return to New Zealand Aviation
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests