Near miss at Ardmore yesterday

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby ZK-KAG » Mon Nov 06, 2006 8:22 am

Hey,

Thought Id share what I heard and saw at Ardmore yesterday...

"Ardmore Traffic, Unicom, Caution High Speed twin entering downwind, remain clear until landed" :drool:

"Ardmore Traffic, OAT Waterworks for fullstop 21" (for those who dont know, waterworks is a reporting point, but is basically the corner of downwind and base)

"AR Traffic Christian 1Y, Aerostar Twin Downwind 21"

Next thing I see the Aerostar climbing at a riduculous rate and over the radio comes... :mellow:

"AR Unicom, Aerostar taking evasive action.." :o

All settles down and the twin ends up making a 3nm finals, with OAT on the grass. Now in the AIP it says that when a twin is in the circuit all other acft make way for it, now OAT clearly did not and was told to Phone Unicom when they were finished (the dreaded 'phone me' that no pilot at AR wants to hear), as was Christian 1Y for a report to be filed to the CAA. Its common sense really that when a plane is bearing down on you you would get out the way!!??? :blink:

~ZK-KAG~
"ZK-KAG"
"We who fly do so for the love of flying. We are alive in the air with this miracle that lies in our hands and beneath our feet"

Image
Check out all the multiplayer action @ ARNZX "FNF"
ZK-KAG
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Palmerston North / Auckland

Postby Charl » Mon Nov 06, 2006 8:58 am

OK...what was OAT supposed to do then, go missed?
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby ZK-KAG » Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:38 am

OAT was joining in the base leg coming from Hunua, so after the Caution call from Unicom, OAT should have orbited over Waterworks or done on overhead rejoin..

Once it got to finals, it was ok as Aerostar was on the sealed and OAT was on the grass.
"ZK-KAG"
"We who fly do so for the love of flying. We are alive in the air with this miracle that lies in our hands and beneath our feet"

Image
Check out all the multiplayer action @ ARNZX "FNF"
ZK-KAG
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Palmerston North / Auckland

Postby ZK-KAG » Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:36 pm

This is a separate incident, but on Friday evening at around 7.00pm. A solo pilot took off on the ex runway 25 (now taxiway Juliet) and crossed the active runway 21 and missed a plane landing by something like 5 metres. The plane landing did not have enough speed or height to go-around, and there was nearly a serious accident.

The two planes involved were FJB (Eagle Flight Training) and an Ardmore Flying School Cessna.

The aerodrome was unattended however there were many witnesses and a thorough CAA Form # 5 has been filed. It is expected that the pilot that took off on the wrong runway will lose his license as this is not the first incident to his name and he has a few 'black dots' to his name. Towerguy will know what im on about. He is of a middle-eastern origin.
"ZK-KAG"
"We who fly do so for the love of flying. We are alive in the air with this miracle that lies in our hands and beneath our feet"

Image
Check out all the multiplayer action @ ARNZX "FNF"
ZK-KAG
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Palmerston North / Auckland

Postby BerG » Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:44 pm

Haha, yeah taking off on taxiways doesnt look to good on the old file :/
BerG
 

Postby ardypilot » Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:27 am

A solo pilot took off on the ex runway 25 (now taxiway Juliet) and crossed the active runway 21 and missed a plane landing by something like 5 metres. The plane landing did not have enough speed or height to go-around, and there was nearly a serious accident.

:o Crikey!
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby FlyingKiwi » Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:50 am

Wow, taking off on the that disused runway/taxiway is a pretty major no-no, not to mention extremely unsafe; if he has a history of "rule breaking" like you said I would hope he does lose his license...
User avatar
FlyingKiwi
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 1688
Location: Auckland

Postby ZK-KAG » Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:52 am

taking off on the that disused runway/taxiway is a pretty major no-no


Yeah.. I also cant see how you can make that mistake as its clearly marked with white crosses along the "centreline". Not to mention the fact that its in such a bad state of repair anyway...
"ZK-KAG"
"We who fly do so for the love of flying. We are alive in the air with this miracle that lies in our hands and beneath our feet"

Image
Check out all the multiplayer action @ ARNZX "FNF"
ZK-KAG
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Palmerston North / Auckland

Postby Dreamweaver » Mon Dec 18, 2006 11:21 am

Just wondering should this kind of thing be discussed if a CAA investigation is underway? Unless its been reported by the media which would make speculation to the incident more likely.
Dreamweaver
 

Postby ZK-Brock » Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:22 pm

Why does Ardmore not have a tower, and only manned Unicom? Surely a tower would increase safety...
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby ZK-KAG » Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:02 pm

Just wondering should this kind of thing be discussed if a CAA investigation is underway? Unless its been reported by the media which would make speculation to the incident more likely.


I cant see why not, as what Ive said here is directly from someone who saw the event first hand (they were on the base leg). I dont really see the harm in just chatting here, as Im just telling what I heard... :)

Why does Ardmore not have a tower, and only manned Unicom? Surely a tower would increase safety...


One would think, but as soon as this runway 25 was disestablished, the need for one decreased. Also when the Aerodrome went private, there wasnt the funds to keep it going. <_<
Last edited by ZK-KAG on Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"ZK-KAG"
"We who fly do so for the love of flying. We are alive in the air with this miracle that lies in our hands and beneath our feet"

Image
Check out all the multiplayer action @ ARNZX "FNF"
ZK-KAG
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Palmerston North / Auckland

Postby Zöltuger » Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:50 pm

i imagine there would be a big hike in landing fees if there was a tower
Zöltuger
 

Postby ZK-Brock » Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:07 pm

Yeah, but what is the price of safety? Perhaps they could call on NZFF to get some ATC going! Me, Alex, Craig and Jimmy could start our own little tower! >nzflag< >nzflag< >nzflag<
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby ZK-Brock » Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:13 pm

Also Keagan, be careful about posting stuff you hear on the radio. I'm pretty sure it's illegal to publicise the details any actual accident heard on the radio, though I'll have to check my air law book.
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby ZK-KAG » Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:41 pm

Also Keagan, be careful about posting stuff you hear on the radio. I'm pretty sure it's illegal to publicise the details any actual accident heard on the radio, though I'll have to check my air law book.


Wow, OK, well if that is the case then I wont, but I sure havnt heard about this.. ^_^

As for what I heard above in my first post.. there was no 'incident' as such, as nothing ever came of it. But yeah cool if you could check that up monkey that would be good.
"ZK-KAG"
"We who fly do so for the love of flying. We are alive in the air with this miracle that lies in our hands and beneath our feet"

Image
Check out all the multiplayer action @ ARNZX "FNF"
ZK-KAG
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Palmerston North / Auckland

Postby BerG » Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:44 pm

Yeah it's illegal to talk to the media about what you heard on the radio if an accident occured.
BerG
 

Postby towerguy » Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:46 am

why no tower at AR - used to be but users don"t want to

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

same is currently going on at Taupo :(
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby ZK-Brock » Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:46 pm

towerguy wrote: why no tower at AR - used to be but users don"t want to

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

same is currently going on at Taupo :(

I'd do it on the cheap! Its better than getting $15 a day to pick berries... <_<
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035


Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests