Best "Classic" Airliner for FSX (Freeware or Payware)?

Discuss aircraft addons and repaints for Flight Simulator here

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:17 am

The RJ/146 is great , limited bang for dollar i'd stick with the CS727 or 707 , this newly released model i had a play last night ... its good but with limited funding stick with CS .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby deeknow » Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:15 pm

bennz wrote:
QUOTE (bennz @ Aug 26 2012,11:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Some screenshots of VC and exterior would be great!:)

Ben. Plenty of screenies following covering all areas of the model....
http://qwsim.com/index.php/146-overview
You may have read some stuff earlier about the CLS/JustFlight model, also looks very nice, but seems the QWings has a good lead on it detail/systems wise
Deans repaints: http://www.deeknow.com/
X570 Mini-ITX m/b - Ryzen7 5700X3D (8c/16t) - RTX 2060-super - 32GB 3600MHz DDR4 - Win10 - P3Dv5.3
User avatar
deeknow
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:15 pm
Posts: 4448
Location: NZHN

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:34 pm

I have heard a lot of disappointment with the CLS model , course i needed to look at the QW for the first time , think they maybe on par with each other depending on what you want from the model .
Last edited by Ian Warren on Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby hasegawa » Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:08 pm

First, forget the Justflight BAe 146-200. It ist not worth the money. After they produced a Comet with a longer right wing and a DC-3, not really capabkle of IFR, forget them. They produced to hasty.
The QW Avro RJ are a good representation of the later history of this type and all user of the ´RJ´s got the BAe 146-100/200/300 as a free update. That´s service, man! You got a lot more aircraft for the money with QW. CLS aircraft are pretty aircraft... for the eyes. After the miserable Cockpit, that have nothing to do with the real thing for their MD-83 i have nothing to do with them.

The Quality from the QW Avro RJ´s is outstanding. It has something to do with it, that in Germany it is very popular. In these days a lot otf people stop flying with all other aircraft and the forums are full of them. That some of the "Einsteins" want to tell us, "this is not good, this is not in the package"... ,forget it. This aircraft has all things needed for a good and interesting flight. The modell for FS 9 was good, this for FSX is very good. Some of the faults of the FS 2004-aircraft are gone with the first SP after 5 weeks. The FSX-Variant has from the start not these problems.
User avatar
hasegawa
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:00 pm
Posts: 1836
Location: Potsdam, Germany and Riga, Latvia

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:20 pm

Andreas , we have our home grown BAe146 developer/expert Jon Murchison , he posted screen on the type , the CLS model , i'm sure he will purchase the QW model and will give a good rundown on the two , but i'm happy with QW , waiting for good mate who flew them for Ansett to stop in here and try it out cool.gif
Last edited by Ian Warren on Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby hasegawa » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:16 pm

Yes, Jon´s work is not forgottern. He give us a 146, as no of those Big Players like Just Flight, Aerosoft, PMDG.... has any interest in this aircraft. Think he is the right man to tell us, what we can find in the QW or the CLS-Aircraft... and what not...
User avatar
hasegawa
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:00 pm
Posts: 1836
Location: Potsdam, Germany and Riga, Latvia

Previous

Return to Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests