Airbus Sharklets

A forum for everything else that does not fit into the other categories

Postby cowpatz » Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:17 pm

The new sharklet fitted Airbus. A lot of hype for just winglets.

Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby Splitpin » Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:20 pm

As you said CP " A lot of hype for just winglets."......but thanks anyway thumbup1.gif
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21332
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Charl » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:11 am

Whitcomb Winglets have been around for 35 years... can't help feeling that Airbus and Boeing have been a little precious about adopting them.
Apparently they are prone to flutter, but properly designed give 5% drag improvement at cruise.
Not to be sniffed at - even if less greenhouse gas doesn't excite you, dollars in the pocket should.
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby Naki » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:00 am

Air NZ will be the first winglet A320 operator I believe
User avatar
Naki
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:03 pm
Posts: 7170
Location: Tauranga

Postby cowpatz » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:27 am

Naki wrote:
QUOTE (Naki @ Dec 15 2011,11:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Air NZ will be the first winglet A320 operator I believe


Correct.
Retro fitting winglets to the 767 provided an increase in fuel efficiency of over 6%. Certainly not to be sneered at in these price conscious times. Changed the flight dynamics too with much higher climb and descent speeds.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby connor » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:47 am

At the end of the day it makes for a more efficient wing. A long story, short. winkyy.gif
connor
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:01 am
Posts: 1616
Location: Christchurch

Postby cowpatz » Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:09 am

connor wrote:
QUOTE (connor @ Dec 15 2011,12:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
At the end of the day it makes for a more efficient wing. A long story, short. winkyy.gif


It certainly does for early design wings. You will notice that later aircraft don't have them- B777 onwards.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby brent01 » Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:16 am

it still aint a boeing lolssss biggrin.gif
Image
brent01
Member
 
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:48 am
Posts: 120
Location: NZCH

Postby Ian Warren » Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:12 pm

Just something to titalate the Joe public , lets follow Boeing,s example dry.gif
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51


Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests