Maximum VFR Altitude?

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby Alex » Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:44 pm

I was thinking today, started thinking about VFR flight, and wondered, is there an altitude which aircraft flying VFR cannot exceed? For example in Great Britain I think the maximum VFR altitude is FL195...

Thanks for any help,

Alex
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby towerguy » Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:59 pm

varies from country to country - ie USA is (I think) about fl180 - NZ doesn't have a set limit so far as I am aware so if your aircraft can reach it and the controller will accept you then you can try for it
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby Alex » Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:14 pm

Thanks for that Towerguy, exactly the sort of answer I was looking for. :D

Alex
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby Zöltuger » Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:30 pm

I suppose the question is then "why would you really want to fly VFR at FL330?"
Zöltuger
 

Postby ZK-Brock » Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:37 pm

Heh, you probably couldn't even see half the landmarks you're s'posed to be following from up there! And you might have to dodge the odd Boeing :blink: !
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby flynz » Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:56 pm

monkeybdg wrote: Heh, you probably couldn't even see half the landmarks you're s'posed to be following from up there! And you might have to dodge the odd Boeing :blink: !

Well if you had some schedules handy with you then you could use those odd boeings you spotted as your vfr landmarks :P
flynz
 

Postby ardypilot » Fri Dec 01, 2006 1:54 pm

Well if you had some schedules handy with you then you could use those odd boeings you spotted as your vfr landmarks

:lol: Haha, good one!
Last edited by ardypilot on Fri Dec 01, 2006 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby towerguy » Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:06 pm

something to think about

""why would you really want to fly VFR at FL330?""

what is the difference in the enroute charges - vfr against ifr? - also

""you probably couldn't even see half the landmarks you're s'posed to be following from up there!""

vfr is only the flight rules ie wx and dist from cloud - you can be vfr on top so no vfr landmarks - (use gps or controlled vfr with radar headings?) - or 40nm out to sea still no landmarks!

<_<
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby Alex » Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:29 pm

Interesting thought. :)

Alex
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby mailman » Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:17 am

There is also a medical reason why you dont spend too much time above 10,000 feet when flying vfr in an unpressurised aircraft, hypoxia.

The highest I ever flew in a C172 was 12500 feet as we flew "past" Mt Cook on our way to Queenstown. Still plenty of rock above us and only took about 40 minutes to climb to that altitude!

Mailman
mailman
 


Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests