Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:39 am
by ardypilot
Given to me to review by Captainsim- their very own Boeing 757-200 model. Here are some preview screenies, expect a longer review in the next few days:

user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:12 am
by JonARNZ
Its a great model, one I've had for awhile but have not spent allot of time in, FSX came along and messed up my well laid plans. Look fwd to hearing your thoughts.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:19 am
by brownbox
very nice. Any virtual cockpit and cabin on this plane? If so, I want it! :drool:

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:24 am
by Kelburn
Given to me to review by Captainsim- their very own Boeing 757-200 model


Trolley how do you get companies like that to give you their products so that people like us can review them

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:40 am
by Charl
JonARNZ wrote:Its a great model, one I've had for awhile but have not spent allot of time in, FSX came along and messed up my well laid plans. Look fwd to hearing your thoughts.

Ditto that, nothing wrong with the model but I can't generate excitement about it.
It sits on the hard drive.
Funny because when the POSKY 757 was new, it was my default aircraft.
I concocted a 2D panel lightyears ahead of its time - pushback, callouts, rollout stats, FSDX announcement panel etc etc.

This is going to sound off the wall, but I don't like the brand name Captain Sim.
It's just so ...cheesy, reminds me of a little tugboat going Toot, toot
And I believe it rubs off on the model experience (holds for the Legendary C130 too which I thought over-hyped).
I'm happy to be shot down about this though ;)

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:58 am
by ZK-Brock
The one thing that puts me off captain Sim is the fact that they want your money so much. For example, at this stage the C-130 FSX patch is going to cost to upgrade - we're paying to get their product to work! :angry: :angry:

That said, the aircraft made are generally high quality, especially the exterior models

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:35 am
by ardypilot
Any virtual cockpit and cabin on this plane? If so, I want it!

Yep, virtual cockpit, cabin, gally and toliet!
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

how do you get companies like that to give you their products so that people like us can review them

As it happens, I was writing to Captainsim, asking if they would like to sponsor our next month's screenie comp, which they agreed too :D (sorry Charl), they replied asking me if I would like to review any of their products. I choose the B757 as the RNZAF have one B)

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:05 pm
by Charl
As it happens, I was writing to Captainsim, asking if they would like to sponsor our next month's screenie comp, which they agreed too  (sorry Charl)
Whoops there I went off & insulted next month's sponsor!
Sorry guys you build a great product and I'd just like to take this opportunity... :lol:
monkeybdg wrote:The one thing that puts me off captain Sim is the fact that they want your money so much. For example, at this stage the C-130 FSX patch is going to cost to upgrade - we're paying to get their product to work! :angry:   :angry:That said, the aircraft made are generally high quality, especially the exterior models

Seriously though, it's probably got to do with expectation.
I couldn't wait to get my hands on the C130 - it has amazing features, but I still think there's an issue with the exterior model (I have selected the lo-shine version, monkey).
Look at this, Capsim in the foreground, Dax paint (which incidentally is spot-on, it's the model shine that's wrong) compared with Steve Jenks-painted HTAI C130:

user posted image

It irritates me to the point that I don't want to look at it, and so it lurks in the dark recesses of the HDD :angry:

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:32 pm
by ZK-Brock
You don't like the glossy look Charl? I'm quite a fan of it. BTW Trolly, that VC=Awesome!

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:44 pm
by Kelburn
they replied asking me if I would like to review any of their products


I might write to them and ask if they'd like me to review the 727. ^_^

You don't like the glossy look Charl? I'm quite a fan of it. BTW Trolly, that VC=Awesome!


If anyone wants it, you do realise it's only $21. A bargain!

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:05 pm
by Kelburn
Trolly, who exactly do you give the review to?

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 6:05 pm
by Charl
monkeybdg wrote:You don't like the glossy look Charl? I'm quite a fan of it.

Well military aircraft generally aren't painted in shiny colours.
This helps them to avoid being shot down.

Look at the real thing here, then look at the screenshot above, back here, then back there.
Now tell me you still like the chrome look. :P

user posted image

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:47 pm
by ZK-Brock
Well, I know it's not realistic, but IMO it looks very good in screenshots.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:49 pm
by Jimmy
mmm that don't look to bad trolly, the view angle in the VC looks a bit odd, I have noticed that in quite a few screenshots of it. But prety good looking textures.

What kind of fps do you get with that aircraft? As far as I know its a real frame killer, as with all captainsim stuff <_< I see you have all your scenery turned down, personaly id rather have a average aircraft plus good scenery than a good looking aircraft and a cr@p world out side, cos theres alot more world outside than aircraft.

yes glosy shiny paints look imp[resive and nie in the sim, but certainly not realisitic...look nice thow :P

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:58 pm
by Jenks
Charl, is this not something that could be fixed by adjusting the alpha channel on the paint?

Not always possible, but the alpha channel is there to control the 'shine' on a lot of models.

Just an idea :)

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:03 pm
by ardypilot
Is this not something that could be fixed by adjusting the alpha channel on the paint?

Can this be done through DXTbmp? If so, how?

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:17 pm
by Charl
Jenks wrote: Charl, is this not something that could be fixed by adjusting the alpha channel on the paint?

alpha channel is where I get off the repaint wagon - I just do colours and numbers! :P

Trolly I see there is room to do stuff to the alpha in DXTbmp, I've only ever used it to create a new channel if textures don't show up!

Maybe Jenks and others could open a small discussion thread on the mysteries of the alpha channel and how to manipulate it.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:39 pm
by Ian Warren
Jenks wrote: Charl, is this not something that could be fixed by adjusting the alpha channel on the paint?

Not always possible, but the alpha channel is there to control the 'shine' on a lot of models.

Just an idea  :)

Look at the Andover last friday walking across the ramp, chatting , mention the condition off the dull worn look , any LOW-VIS paint looks polished when completed for a couple of weeks MAX and thats it ! ..after .. they look dirty and meshy and well used (generally to last 5 yrs) , airliners have there big carwash's or at YSSY 2 people running around washin 74 in 2 day's in special scaffold type build'in , oversized carwash :rolleyes: Guessin since Dax works on these aircraft world wide , guess he's looking at a factory finish , If in Charge, i would want to sign the plane out in pristine condition . :)