Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 6:06 pm
by ZK-Brock
This evening I did a quick flight from Nelson to Karamea, not in a 172 but an F-86 Sabre! :drool: >nzflag< I tried this flight the opposite way last night in FS9, but it didn't turn out so well (I got completelylost :D ). Shots taken in FSX, and with different lighting to the real-life flight.

user posted image
Wheels leaving the Nelson 02 bitumen

user posted image
Overhead Ruby Bay, looking Back at the Southern Nelson region

user posted image
The Motueka River

user posted image
Approaching the hills - there's Mt Arthur on the left.

user posted image
Passing Mt Arthur

user posted image
Looking through the hills, I'll be flying through here.

user posted image
Turning to fly via the Karamea River, currently above the Rolling lands. In the 172 we passed south of these, but the bigger radius of turn means we're over them.

user posted image
Now following the Karamea river

user posted image
On the left there is the bit of terrain I got a bit close to yesterday. No worries, just don't go any closer is what my instructor was probably thinking!

user posted image
Approaching the west coast - the rivers don't look too good.

user posted image
In the 172 we went over these hills, through the gap to the left...no need for that in this aircraft!

user posted image
Approaching Karamea

user posted image
Finals. This was quite easy to handle on approach compared to an F-16!

user posted image
On finals still.

user posted image
Touchdown, nice and smooth on the runway.

Unfortunately the F-86 doesn't have very pronounced short-field characteristics, so regrettably I ended up hitting the water at the end of the runway at 50 knots :(

So uh, that's me, and my afernoon flight yesterday :)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:19 pm
by Jimmy
err, not quite a recration, an adaptation thow :P good thikning, who would wana fly that far in a 172 anyway :lol:

What are your average fps? That autogen is so dense looking, the whole thing looks amazing, I can't have any autogen on my system witch is so simerily powerd, hmmm lol

PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:22 pm
by scon
I bet any residents living in the area were happy about you going over low at that hour. :P

But cool shots though

PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:13 am
by ZK-Brock
err, not quite a recration, an adaptation thow tongue.gif good thikning, who would wana fly that far in a 172 anyway


Yeh well, in FS9 I did it in the 172 but when I got lost I gave up and just did some half-assed aeros in it...at least this time if I get lost the aeros can look okay! (Alternatively I could climb over the hills and go direct, but where's the fun in that?).

Oh and BTW, in a 172 it's only 35 minutes one-way- it's only 50nm. And the advantage with going VFR (and being in a 172) is you can go nice and low and see all the scenery really good.

I got about 11fps, which is fine for me in FSX

PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:57 pm
by lowellyerex
I did this trip for real in a 172, then walked back via the Wangapeka track!

PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:51 pm
by ardypilot
Neat shots, is that Kirks model I presume?

PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:47 pm
by ZK-Brock
Trolly wrote: Neat shots, is that Kirks model I presume?

Sure is Trolly. Though this particular repaint doesn't look all that good on it compared to some others IMO.