Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Aug 19 2013,4:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Ooo Ooo Ooo, we need a shakey hand thingy Icon , nothing wrong with the words and chatter .. been there done that before and the thread shriveled like something in serious cold water , this has not got out of hand .. in fact it maybe nudge many off the regulars to get in a hit it off with a "T"
Not sure what you said there little guy ..... but, I know what you mean (thats odd)
Splitpin wrote:QUOTE (Splitpin @ Aug 19 2013,10:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Not sure what you said there little guy ..... but, I know what you mean (thats odd)
I'm up down ... turning around ... idea's ... one said i should have being doing this years ago , the wise one said his words "missed my calling" just a pity many don't post , so easy to do ...
steelsporran wrote:QUOTE (steelsporran @ Aug 20 2013,12:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Then those wanting to see this month's entries to date, won't have to wade through 15 pages.
Just a bloody pity having to wade thru 15 pages .. if peoples entered rather than talked .. be 15 pages of amazing stuff ... not sure if your around when the it was decided to remove the wading waters of pages which for that and that next month is DIED! .. take the comment out ... ya may as well turn the tap off ....
This is one forum , across the world - the board that has some say , good thing if your here everyday or two you don't or won't have to wade , ..................................this is but once a month then its gone and the winner with a prize ..... spilt that up AGAIN ... it will wither and Die
I recall one silly thing said about "The Cold War" thread .... oh i don't believe this .. its waisting my bandwidth ?
Pinned: The Soviets are invading!
The Cold War Thread! 797 81,208 2nd July 2013 - 7:07 PM And its still goingLast edited by Ian Warren on Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bazza wrote:QUOTE (Bazza @ Aug 20 2013,2:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>While the numbers of people posting screenies may be small,
with all the tweaks etc. While it is open to everyone who wants to post a picture, the difference between those submitted by our recent winners
and the average punter having a go, is painfully apparent.
Thus must deter many from having a "bash" at it from their basic set-ups, using
their limited aircraft. Not everyone has a hangar full of payware or the top of the range video card. IMHO....
My rule NUMBER no1 always encourage .. we see screens that are a 'hic him' but if you have been around you like me give it the thumbs UP .. we all cant have these fancy PC's .. but in saying that our "Splitpin" Marty was a good example of producing quality screens pre his up-grade on a low end PC left many wondering how he did it .. Still left me baffled and thought i was good at screen art .
Bazza wrote:QUOTE (Bazza @ Aug 20 2013,1:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>While it is open to everyone who wants to post a picture, the difference between those submitted by our recent winners
and the average punter having a go, is painfully apparent. Thus must deter many from having a "bash" at it from their basic set-ups, using
their limited aircraft. Not everyone has a hangar full of payware or the top of the range video card. IMHO....
Seriously,..those screenshot comps were one (A) by a voting system , (B) had nothing to do with whether they were payware or freeware © because they were great screenshots amongst alot of other great screenshots selected again by a voting poll. I have a low low spec PC, have won a couple comps and all I do is hit the Prt Scr button which uses the FREE Snap Shot program, I use windows picture thingy (that comes with Windows) to crop then upload to Photobucket (which is FREE ). Please do not blame peoples PC setups for not winning as that is complete and utter bollucks !. Plenty people have won the comp with freeware stuff using freeware editing programs and without editing..which has nothing at all to do with winning or losing. Imagination and a well caught screenshot wins the day nothing else.
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Aug 20 2013,4:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>My rule NUMBER no1 always encourage .. we see screens that are a 'hic him' but if you have been around you like me give it the thumbs UP .. we all cant have these fancy PC's .. but in saying that our "Splitpin" Marty was a good example of producing quality screens pre his up-grade on a low end PC left many wondering how he did it .. Still left me baffled and thought i was good at screen art .
Thanks Ian .... i have to be honest , i felt a little odd ( almost guilty) after reading the previous post.(not AB)
I have never set out to blitz the comp , in fact far from it . I have often decided not to enter because of the quality of shots entered.... and have given away several prizes , when i was fortunate enough to win.
Re my system , as you said , my first banner was made on a rig that really struggled with FS9 ! and Im very proud of that win.
My current system is far from state of the art (relatively speaking ) and i only have that , thanks to the generosity of a fellow forum member who gifted me the graphics card , along with his collection of Orbx discs (not sure if i say can that ... but i have) ...... and Doug , who put the whole thing together and upgraded it for me ..... and then waited for many months while i paid him off bit by bit .... thank you Bill and Big D.
Bottom line is , it comes down to the voters..... this whole thing has really become a little odd ,Im not sure if i want to be part of it anymore.Last edited by Splitpin on Tue Aug 20, 2013 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
AlisterC wrote:QUOTE (AlisterC @ Aug 20 2013,7:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>... SP, I know you'll take no disrespect from this. If I had a choice between 1 brilliant shot from a member I don't really know, and 1 brilliant shot from you, I'd probably vote for the other member knowing you'll get looked after with votes from the other members who might think the opposite to me. Personality can work for you, and against you obviously. In an anonymous competition it is your screenshot that wins or loses fair and square on artist merit alone...
Which to me shows that there are as many reasons why people arrive at their vote as there are members. Most voters will vote for their favourite screenshot, so any votes based on personality (or any one of a hundred random reasons) will cancel themselves out. I'm not saying that you don't make some good points, but there are technicalities. An anonymous comp means that Doug would need to upload all the shots, which means a lot of extra work for him. Same with the way in which we vote -- this uses the built-in poll software, which is the very same system where you'd get to choose your favourite breakfast cereal. The members and the forum software do the work during the month (the members by uploading and linking their image), but Doug already needs to do a lot of work to prep for the vote at the end of the month, as there's no automatic way of doing that. Changing this would mean at least three or four times the work for Doug.
As far as the thumbnails are concerned, I'd be surprised if anyone who actually took the trouble to vote would not take the time to look at the screenshots. I do this as they are posted, which means that by the end of the month I already have a shortlist, even if by then I've forgotten whose shot was whose.
AlisterC wrote:QUOTE (AlisterC @ Aug 20 2013,8:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I like the quality of the competition, and having visited many forums in my time this forum ranks the highest. Having stiff competition drives us harder in many regards to do better. Seeing good shots also shows us what to look for in a well framed winner. We can see where we need to improve.
Alister , you nailed it .. And i believe i have said it before , Its just the getting in and doing a simple screen , you here do your fights , you see a shot that WOWs ya ... and if the next below ya younger or older brother thinks he can beat ya ... , crikey think what would happen if mum decided to jump in ... you'd all be cooking dinner tonight , now lets see
Steak .. nah last night
Chicken maybe
Fish .. Lunch today
Arrr ..... Lambs Fry...... yuck !
Last edited by Ian Warren on Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Splitpin wrote:QUOTE (Splitpin @ Aug 20 2013,8:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>"I'd probably vote for the other member" as you should Al ...... i 100% understand.
This whole pile of cr@p was started by some one who should know better .... and as a result , Im not posting in the comps anymore , its obvious there is a lot of underlying feeling out there ... so its all yours.
I will continue to post in the screenshot forum , and vote in the comp , but otherwise Im OUT.
I just hope this whole bun fight wont put the sponsors off ..... keep up the good work Doug
This was started by me, and I've just checked back on what I posted, and I can't see the problem. I was talking about a few extra restrictions on the comp. Some people took something else from what I posted. I ignored most of these, as they were not valid to the discussion. Some I tried to answer, but maybe I shouldn't have.
I suspect that Doug took this as an attack on him. It wasn't. He was within his rights to react that way. But if anyone here has a problem/query/question/suggestion, then they shouldn't have to worry about offending the admin by asking it. The rush to defend Doug was commendable, but kind of creeped me out in a way -- and didn't in any way relate to my post. I did see a post which referred to this as 'bickering', but to me it has always just been a discussion. If anyone thinks that we shouldn't discuss anything which might be construed as negative, then that's their right, but I'll never accept that as the truth.
In the end, almost nobody addressed my original point, so I can only assume that everyone is happy with the way things are. Fair enough. But why not just say that?
Charl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ Aug 20 2013,9:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I like the anonymous shot thing...
Doug you are the judge of whether it'll be too hard: someone PM's a link which you post.
On average, maybe 1 a day.
In my previous post I did kind of discount this idea, as a lot of image hosts identify the owner in the URl-- but there are some that don't, such as FSFiles and Postimage. So it could work that way, if people don't mind changing their image hosts.
Splitpin wrote:QUOTE (Splitpin @ Aug 20 2013,8:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>and as a result , Im not posting in the comps anymore , its obvious there is a lot of underlying feeling out there ... so its all yours.
SP I hope this is not due to what I said. It was not my intention to offend you. I thought I would choose you as an example as you were so perfect for it. I just meant that I would most likely vote for the young Padowan when the choice was between him and the Jedi Master like your yourself. You can more than handle yourself.
And my point at the end of my post stands. Only by having the bar set high in front of us can we possibly aim higher! You are one of those who set that bar for the rest of us to reach. And especially since you prove it can be done on lower end systems. It's all about developing an eye for a great shot.
So I hope you have a think and see you again in the competition sometime. I don't post everytime as the theme doesn't always suit, but would be glad to run against you sometime soon.
![]()
No problem if my suggestions are not well liked or feasible, just thought I would put them out there while the opportunity existed.
Thanks to Doug for all the hard work required every month. I used to run this every month elsewhere, without organising prizes or sponsors, so my hat off to you..Last edited by AlisterC on Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests