jroger (0010) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr
jroger (0006) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr
jroger (0004) by JanKees Blom, on Flickr
jroger (0003) by JanKees Blom, on FlickrStirling
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Stirling
by Splitpin » Sun Mar 19, 2023 12:23 pm
Great choice and beautiful work JK.
Another great British bomber overshadowed by the Lancaster.
Another great British bomber overshadowed by the Lancaster.
-
Splitpin - NZFF Pro
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
- Posts: 18908
- Location: Christchurch NZ
Re: Stirling
by Charl » Sun Mar 19, 2023 2:37 pm
Longer than a Lancaster, I read.
Could out-turn a Bf 110! but couldn't make more than 12,000ft or so, result of MOD specs limiting wingspan. Later became a glider tug.
Poor old thing.
Could out-turn a Bf 110! but couldn't make more than 12,000ft or so, result of MOD specs limiting wingspan. Later became a glider tug.
Poor old thing.-
Charl - NZFF Pro
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
- Posts: 8126
- Location: Auckland
Re: Stirling
by chopper_nut » Sun Mar 19, 2023 9:54 pm
The wingspan was limited by the perceived need for it to fit into RAF hangars. Bit of a pity as it could've been a really good aeroplane.
-
chopper_nut - NZFF Pro
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:58 pm
- Posts: 2792
- Location: The malaria ridden jungles of PNG
Re: Stirling
by hasegawa » Fri Mar 24, 2023 3:34 am
Just the right height for the 88 Of all the bombers over Germany, the thing was the worst of its time. Natural flak feeding.
-
hasegawa - Senior Member
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:00 pm
- Posts: 1360
- Location: Potsdam, Germany and Riga, Latvia
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests