Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:50 am
by ardypilot
From stuff.co.nz



Teenager Andrew Wilkinson captured an apparently fiery object in the Canterbury sky on his digital camera last night.

Wilkinson, 17, photographed the object, at left, from his Halswell home at 7.27pm.

He said it was too slow to be a meteor or a plane, and wondered if it might be satellite debris in the western sky.

A handful of other observant Cantabrians also spotted the orange ribbon standing out brightly in the dusk.

"I got the camera and took a photo. It was moving extremely slowly, so I thought it might have been a plane for a minute. The front looked like a fireball.

"I didn't hear any noise. It looks like it might have been extremely high up, given the speed it was moving," he said.

Police southern communications shift supervisor Trevor Cross said he received one phone call about the phenomenon. A policeman at Oxford also saw it and thought it might be a vapour trail.

The superintendent of the University of Canterbury's Mount John Observatory at Tekapo, Alan Gilmore , said his "immediate reaction" was it was a plane.

"The slowness would be due to the plane's movement. I assume from the contrail's angle that it is a plane heading for Australia," Gilmore said. "The trail doesn't look at all like a meteor or space-debris trail."


Another UFO? :unsure:

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:13 pm
by Ian Warren
Canterbury Northwest sky , seen this many times , people just dont look , only when a outdoors person with a camera in hand in the right light and time , then all the fuss.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:30 pm
by victor_alpha_charlie
Isn't it just a contrail lit up by the sun?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:05 pm
by brownbox
I beleive it is. Never the less, it looks pretty good. I dont get why its bent though

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:32 pm
by NZ255
brownbox wrote:
QUOTE (brownbox @ Apr 5 2008, 09:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I beleive it is. Never the less, it looks pretty good. I dont get why its bent though

Maybe the point was the T.O.D?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:17 pm
by victor_alpha_charlie
NZ255 wrote:
QUOTE (NZ255 @ Apr 5 2008, 11:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Maybe the point was the T.O.D?


What.. A 767 on descent into Haast? :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:49 am
by NZ255
victor_alpha_charlie wrote:
QUOTE (victor_alpha_charlie @ Apr 5 2008, 11:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What.. A 767 on descent into Haast? :lol:

QUOTE
"The slowness would be due to the plane's movement. I assume from the contrail's angle that it is a plane heading for Australia..."[/quote]

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:56 pm
by AlisterC
Actually, given it's time of day I would be guessing that it is the Emirates A340 departing for Sydney. What this view will be will be that as it is climbing, it eventually hits the colder air and the contrail is formed. As it is higher in the atmosphere than the surrounding clouds it will turn bright orange/ fire coloured later than the lower clouds which have already lost the sun. The kink could either be top of climb, or a turn on route. So it's a nice thought, but given Emirates departs sometimes at 7.05pm, and even if it left a little late, that would put the timing spot on for this particular UFO :D

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Lufthansa/A...313X/1234706/L/

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:51 pm
by victor_alpha_charlie
You wouldn't see a plane on descent into Australia from Christchurch..

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:20 pm
by AlisterC
If you picture the object flying away from you, it looks to me like the contrail starts as it's climbing, and the aircraft is flying off the west ;) It's very hard to tell in a 2d photo the direction it is travelling unfortunately.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:27 pm
by victor_alpha_charlie
Albatross wrote:
QUOTE (Albatross @ Apr 6 2008, 08:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you picture the object flying away from you, it looks to me like the contrail starts as it's climbing, and the aircraft is flying off the west ;) It's very hard to tell in a 2d photo the direction it is travelling unfortunately.


Yeah that was directed at Nick :D

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:15 pm
by NZ255
victor_alpha_charlie wrote:
QUOTE (victor_alpha_charlie @ Apr 6 2008, 07:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yeah that was directed at Nick :D

Hey, just reading what the paper says :rules:

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:41 pm
by brownbox
Albatross wrote:
QUOTE (Albatross @ Apr 11 2008, 05:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Wow that looks cool

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:25 am
by AlisterC
brownbox wrote:
QUOTE (brownbox @ Apr 7 2008, 08:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow that looks cool


Just don't tell the Greenies B.B :D ;)

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:07 pm
by brownbox
Albatross wrote:
QUOTE (Albatross @ Apr 12 2008, 08:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Just don't tell the Greenies B.B :D ;)

:lol: