QUOTE
Regarding #1 Engine continuing to run at the last commanded thrust based on loss of command, I don't believe that is the case, or at least maybe it differs for the control systems of different aircraft/engine combinations. I've experienced a CFM engine return to idle power due to loss of thrust command. The FADEC sends out a signal to an RVDT at the thrust lever in the cockpit, and the return signal (dependent on the position of thrust lever) is split into two parts which have to match each other within 2%. If they are not within 2%, signals from the channel not in command will be used, so long as they are within 2%. If the signals from both channels are out of range, then the FADEC commands the engine to idle. If the Aircraft on Ground signal is not available to the FADEC (ie the wire has been severed) then idle speed will be at flight idle rather than ground idle even when the aircraft is on the ground, for failsafe reasons.[/quote]
Also here is reply # 242, about the engine continuing to go until it runs out of fuel - You'd think that if nothing else there would be a physical manual shutoff somewhere that crash crews could get to, but where would you put it ? Would you want to creep up on a Trent 900 to open a panel on the side and turn the tap off ?
Also here is reply # 242, about the engine continuing to go until it runs out of fuel - You'd think that if nothing else there would be a physical manual shutoff somewhere that crash crews could get to, but where would you put it ? Would you want to creep up on a Trent 900 to open a panel on the side and turn the tap off ?
QUOTE
A few posts mentioned the Etihad A340 in Toulouse.
In that case, engines #1 and #2 struck the blast wall, but both engines #3 and #4 kept running.
Engine #4 was indeed "drowned" after nearly three hours, using water and foam, but engine #3 kept running until the fuel was exhausted, because the engine was too close to the blast wall to get enough water and foam into the engine.[/quote]
In that case, engines #1 and #2 struck the blast wall, but both engines #3 and #4 kept running.
Engine #4 was indeed "drowned" after nearly three hours, using water and foam, but engine #3 kept running until the fuel was exhausted, because the engine was too close to the blast wall to get enough water and foam into the engine.[/quote]
The above post is in the public domain and is guaranteed by the manufacturer to contain no references to anything illegal or discussion of piracy, although this signature may contain traces of nuts.
- Chairman
- Sim-holic
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:07 pm
- Posts: 912
