Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:57 pm
by scon
I think NZCH is the bussiest (at certain times of the year) becuase of the Project Deep Freez, AK takes the most people though

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:04 pm
by A185F
Movements for controlled airports in 06 go in this order:

Auckland
Christchurch
Wellington
Hamilton
Tauranga
Palmy North
Nelson
Queenstown
Ohakea
New Plymouth
Dunedin
Woodbourne
Gisborne
Invercargill
Napier
Rotorua
Whenuapai
Milford

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:28 pm
by ZK-KAG
Thanks A185F, I thought Auckland had to be tops...

Movements for all airports in NZ during 2006, was Ardmore :)

PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:35 am
by FlyingKiwi
A185F wrote: Movements for controlled airports in 06 go in this order:

.
.
.

Milford

Is Milford actually controlled? I was under the impression they just had some sort of advisory service?

PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:56 pm
by A185F
It is a flight service station provided by Airways nz (which is where I got this data) and is not "controlled" as such but still has a tower and you still talk to them and a slip is raised etc. So instead of requesting something, you advise them of your intentions and they give information relivant to you but you are still responsable for your own seperation etc etc.
Im not 100% sure of how the system works, I just do what the plane in front of me does when I go in.
It can be very interesting and extreemly busy in there but only at curtain times of curtain days of curtain times of the year. E.g most aircraft will go in at say 1030 am for an 11am sailing of the boats on a fine day in summer, all while fitting in with the local senic flights. In that case its just a game of follow the plane in front and dont hit anything, cos its like yr flying in a cardboard box as opposed to the wide open skys of a regular aerodrome........

PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:21 pm
by travnz
Pretty much like the unicom we have at AR

PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:44 pm
by A185F
hmm sort of but alot more involved, more like a controlled airport (but not controlled) rather than the unicom which sorta sits in the background. Hard to explain, Im sure someone else knows it a bit better than mwa :thumbup:

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 9:21 am
by towerguy
interesting thing about Auckland movements too is - no circuit traffic. ie no bug smashers racking up 8 to 12 movements in a session. usually each movement in AA is a standalone flight. Plus due to the larger number of heavies operating, there are more delays due to wake turbulence separation requirements.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 9:35 am
by scon
A185F wrote: hmm sort of but alot more involved, more like a controlled airport (but not controlled) rather than the unicom which sorta sits in the background. Hard to explain, Im sure someone else knows it a bit better than mwa :thumbup:

Don't they call that "multicom"

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 11:02 am
by FlyingKiwi
A185F wrote: hmm sort of but alot more involved, more like a controlled airport (but not controlled) rather than the unicom which sorta sits in the background. Hard to explain, Im sure someone else knows it a bit better than mwa :thumbup:

Well, thanks for the info anyway, I know more than I did this time yesterday. :P

PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:23 pm
by Brennanx
actually ardmore is the busiest :) I think but those small bug smashers not big bug smashers.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:04 pm
by ZKTOM
actually ardmore is the busiest


I totally agree with that ;)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:50 pm
by Duckman
ZKTOM wrote:
actually ardmore is the busiest


I totally agree with that ;)

Lolz, absolutely!