Aviation Services PPL exam difficulty

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby FlyingKiwi » Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:03 am

There are a few people who did a couple of my PPL classes who had done all their CPL papers, but only some of their PPL papers, and then the law changed before they sat their CPL flight test, so they had to go back and do PPL theory, for the papers they had missed.
Last edited by FlyingKiwi on Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
FlyingKiwi
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 1688
Location: Auckland

Postby mailman » Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:13 am

Do you know what the reasoning was behind that change??

I mean, what is covered in the PPL that isnt covered in greater depth in the CPL exams?

Mailman
mailman
 

Postby chopper_nut » Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:24 am

I just think it was a money thing. Nelson Aviation College runs a really good ground course on CPL theory. Thats what I was going to go and do, spend 10 weeks or whatever doing that and then not having to worry about the exams at all. It sounds bad but I really do think that too many people were doing it and they wernt sucking as much money. The prices for the exams went up at the same time.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
chopper_nut
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: Wherever the work is

Postby ZK-Brock » Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:26 am

We get a lot of CPLs-in-training from the nelson aviation college round NZNS (theyre based at NZMK). In fact I believe my instructor was fresh out of the college when she started instructing.
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby FlyingKiwi » Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:25 pm

mailman wrote: Do you know what the reasoning was behind that change??

I mean, what is covered in the PPL that isnt covered in greater depth in the CPL exams?

Mailman

Nah I don't really know. As you say, pretty much everything in PPL is covered again in CPL and then expanded on further.
User avatar
FlyingKiwi
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 1688
Location: Auckland

Postby ZK-Brock » Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:01 pm

Anyone know when i could expect my results?
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby kiwiflyboy » Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:02 pm

You can check on their website http://www.aviation.co.nz and i think its usually within 10 days or so....... (they are useless though)
kiwiflyboy
 

Postby mailman » Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:56 am

monkeybdg wrote: Anyone know when i could expect my results?

MARKING AND RESULTS
Normally, multi-choice examinations will be marked within 7 working days from the date of sitting. Long answer examinations will normally be marked within 10 working days from the date of sitting.


Note their wording...MARKED! They will mark your work within 7 or 10 days. Nothing there about when you will actually receive your marks!

And lets be honest here, its a f8cking template for short answers, how hard can it be to mark the tests on the day or even straight after the exam and give the results back to you on the spot OR within 5 working days (even taking in to account 3 days for postage!).

This is one of the many reasons I think these guys are c8nts! They have a monopoly and because of this they dont have to provide you with a service! IF they had some true competition they would be forced to pick their game up and actually provide a service!

Bunch of f8cking w8nkers!

There, I feel much better now :P

Mailman
mailman
 

Postby ZK-Brock » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:20 am

Good to know Mailman :lol:

Anyway I cannot find my acceptance slip for the exam, and therefore my slip number. This means that I cannot use the online results tool. Surely there would be another way to get the results? I mean, not everyone has the internet so how would they get their results

Brock
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby BerG » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:53 am

monkeybdg wrote: Surely there would be another way to get the results? I mean, not everyone has the internet so how would they get their results

Brock

By mail.
BerG
 

Postby ZK-Brock » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:54 am

Do they send it to me automatically or do I have to pay for that too
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby chopper_nut » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:43 am

They send the results on paper to your address, you have to give these to the aeroclub or whoever you are flying with and thats the official record. I just got my results for tech, and I am not happy. I passed with 80% but after doing the sample exam and doing all the exercises in the book, the way the questions were written was totally different. Mailman is right, these guys are a bunch of bandits.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
chopper_nut
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: Wherever the work is

Postby ZK-Brock » Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:00 am

So I CAN expect the results to come in the mail?
Last edited by ZK-Brock on Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby kiwiflyboy » Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:23 am

Yeah, it will have your KDR's (Knowledge deficiency report) which you must write about, and get signed off by a B or A cat instructor, before sitting any flight test. I'm doing my commercial ones now........ What a pain :angry:
kiwiflyboy
 

Postby ZK-Brock » Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:22 pm

Yeya, 88% in the FRTO. That's 22/25, the same as FlyingKiwi. However I'm confused about this deficency report thing. It says "syllabus objectives for which your knowledge deficiencies have been identified are listed. See AC61 for pilot syllabus references". IOt then gives the following "syllabus references":
2. 12.2 (a)
2. 12.2 ©
2. 16.8

What's this all about? I looked at the CAA AC61 but its broken into many different parts and I'm getting confused!
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby kiwiflyboy » Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:09 pm

http://www.caa.govt.nz/Advisory_Circulars/ac61-1_3.pdf page 13, has the FRTO on it. each number has a different thing, so look for 2.12.2a and write out displaying you know what it is...
Last edited by kiwiflyboy on Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
kiwiflyboy
 

Postby BerG » Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:30 pm

monkeybdg wrote: Yeya, 88% in the FRTO. That's 22/25, the same as FlyingKiwi. However I'm confused about this deficency report thing. It says "syllabus objectives for which your knowledge deficiencies have been identified are listed. See AC61 for pilot syllabus references". IOt then gives the following "syllabus references":
2. 12.2 (a)
2. 12.2 ©
2. 16.8

What's this all about? I looked at the CAA AC61 but its broken into many different parts and I'm getting confused!

You should have an Advisory Circular stating all you need to know for the exam, which has the numbers with the corresponding information.

They really are bandits with the way some questions are written.

Some of the stupid things that came back to me on the KDRs for PPL was:

-Descibe the clock direction thingy (You know, "Cessna in your 3 o'clock, 5 miles")

The most simple thing ever. The only explanation I can think of for how I got that wrong is that they worded the question stupidly.
BerG
 

Postby ZK-Brock » Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:44 pm

Thanks guys. I've read through all this and remembered the ones I got wrong. One was as simple as whether to read back the time or not when the controller says 'time 32'
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

Postby towerguy » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:27 pm

after reading all of the above and being involved in the aviation field for over 25 odd years now all I can say is

" welcome to the real world of aviation"
and remember

" the reason god gave pilots a nose is so they have something to pay through!"

just remember

"1-if it moves - it needs a pilot - if it needs a pilot he needs a licence - we can charge him!
2-if it doesn't move - then its broke - it needs an engineer - the engineer needs a licence - we can charge him!
3- it will then move - see number 1!"

just some truisms picked up over beers between sobs :unsure:
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby ZK-Brock » Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:29 am

Heheh thatnks Towerguy, but reading PPrune has slowly but surely depressed me enough :unsure: :P
ZK-Brock
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 2035

PreviousNext

Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests