NZFF

Posted: **Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:42 pm**

Just up loaded it to Avsim, so should be online soon.

For FSX

Includes

Taxi Signes
Realistic Parking
And 2 working air bridges

Also is compatible with Ian's photo Dunedin so you don't get double runways

Regards, Scott

Posted: **Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:34 pm**

Ah, FSX

. Well, I'll give it a shot next time I load up FSX.

Alex

Posted: **Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:10 pm**

Don't have FSX running at present - could you perhaps post a screenshot to show what it looks like after installation of the AFCAD?

Posted: **Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:52 pm**

Don't have FSX running at present

Oh, why is that Charl? I thought you splashed out on a new rig specifically to run FSX?

Posted: **Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:46 am**

yea sure will see what I can do

Posted: **Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:59 am**

Here you go

user posted image

Posted: **Sat Jul 07, 2007 1:32 pm**

Hey .. pretty sure or think it will work in FS9 ,

Thanks Scott

I'd check it out shortly , better carry on pourin the concrete .

Posted: **Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:02 pm**

Trolly wrote:
Don't have FSX running at present

Oh, why is that Charl? I thought you splashed out on a new rig specifically to run FSX?

Yes I did, but I had a fallback position - FS9 has never looked better or run better.
Nothing I can throw at the sim makes the slightest performance difference, and I haven't explored half of what's available in the addon market.
I don't want to highjack this thread, but look again at this topic, then at Scon's shots above, and tell me why I would be running FSX, taking performance hits every time something other than desert textures show up ??

I do not regard FSX as a successor to FS9 at this time, and will continue investing in FS9 addons for many months hence - certainly for the life of my present computing setup.
Wait a minute, that puts me in FSXII territory!
So be it...

Posted: **Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:23 pm**

Charl wrote:
Trolly wrote:
Don't have FSX running at present

Oh, why is that Charl? I thought you splashed out on a new rig specifically to run FSX?

Yes I did, but I had a fallback position - FS9 has never looked better or run better.
Nothing I can throw at the sim makes the slightest performance difference, and I haven't explored half of what's available in the addon market.
I don't want to highjack this thread, but look again at this topic, then at Scon's shots above, and tell me why I would be running FSX, taking performance hits every time something other than desert textures show up ??

I do not regard FSX as a successor to FS9 at this time, and will continue investing in FS9 addons for many months hence - certainly for the life of my present computing setup.
Wait a minute, that puts me in FSXII territory!
So be it...

By no means is mine a Photo Real NZDN airport or anything of the sort it is Just a better AFCAD that the default and a bit of a fix for the photoreal dunedin scenery

Posted: **Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:41 am**

There was talk some time ago about someone creating scenery for Dunedin Airport for FS9, anyone know who was looking at this or if any progress has been made?? :thumbup:

Posted: **Sun Jul 08, 2007 11:37 am**

Does the one HERE not work

Posted: **Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:22 pm**

scon wrote: Does the one HERE not work

It's not an accurate rendition of the real Dunedin Airport, infact looks nothing like it.... :blink:

Posted: **Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:32 pm**

I use this one. It isn't the greatest, but is the best around

NZFF

NZDN AFCAD