creator2003 wrote:QUOTE (creator2003 @ Jan 18 2012,11:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I think they are ok and look better then default ,i havent fully done a tour over of every area but i feel the textures have done more for rivers, lakes and coastlines than anything else ive seen or used for NZ so far to date ,everything outside of the airport is suppose to be viewed at 1000ft or so ,lower level may take abit of the realism out around coast and other parts but overall not bad .
Sorry Newbie Simmer,
FSX astounded me. Saw MS Flight and thought graphics were incredible, but I’m not looking for a Flying Game I like the Simulator experience better. Have MSFS 98 but it never really did go well on that 486 of mine…and then got lost in other things. So very New Simmer to FSX and the first thing I started to do was look at scenery. As I live in the Naki first port of call was scenery for it. Low and behold I found Godzone Taranaki. Hate to say it but all scenery will be compared to what I saw after install of their ok “photorealistic scenery†but you can’t tell me that It’s impossible to improve the shoreline a little in Autogen scenery.
MS Autogen scenery to Godzone scenery.
Could ORBX have gone a little further with the shorline? I think so.
Sinz







