100% ad-free

AndrewJamez wrote:QUOTE (AndrewJamez @ Aug 14 2011,10:29 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I just read the kiwi sim thread. Are my eye's deceiving me?? Did i just read that the russians have addmitted that the past 10 years of SOW , now namde COD development was a complete waste of time and are basically re-writing a new graphics and sound engine???????????? Unbeleivable! Hopefully UBISOFT will keep their dirty hands out of it.
Ubisoft have killed many a decent project. I've been involved in development or testing some combat sims in the past, and the moment Ubisoft got involved, things turned ugly.
My gut feeling is that when the COD developers got involved with Ubi, they more or less stopped work - and just let them have their early (beta) code.Last edited by Adamski on Sun Aug 14, 2011 11:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Esquire wrote:QUOTE (Esquire @ Aug 14 2011,4:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>It is sad to see CoD performing so badly, but I remember not being able to run IL2 on max for the first four years till I was able to upgrade to better hardware at a reasonable price. I generally run systems 2-3 years behind market release so it's affordable.
It's not that it *performs* badly ... it's just badly done throughout. I've played better (freeware) BoB campaigns for IL-2 than the pathetic offering in COD.
Adamski wrote:QUOTE (Adamski @ Aug 14 2011,6:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>It's not that it *performs* badly ... it's just badly done throughout. I've played better (freeware) BoB campaigns for IL-2 than the pathetic offering in COD.
And there you've hit the nail on the head Adam.... even IL-2's out-of-the-box campaigns were arse. Historically, 1C have really known how to make amazing sims, but can't do a campaign to save themselves....same unfortunately holds true for Cliffs of Dover apparently...

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests