FSX Specifications

The place to ask for help or solve each others technical issues and discuss hardware

Postby Chris Donaldson » Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:30 pm

Hello,

I'm wondering if the FSX users amongst us could help me out a little.

I'm going to be upgrading my PC for my 21st Birthday present, and I've been doing some research into just about every component in the PC to see what would run best. I've almost settled on the idea of having this system:

Intel Core 2 Duo 2.66GZ or 3GHZ.
Asus P5B Motherboard
2-3GB DDR2 800mhz RAM
Geforce 7950GT 512MB PCI-E
600W PSU

So the FSX users amongst us, if you could let me know your system spec's and what the best all round setup would be to run FSX nicely.

Cheers,
Chris Donaldson
 

Postby ooOO00OOoo » Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:27 pm

That will run FSX nicely.
Your specs are a little bit better than mine and i can play mine on almost all full settings(except autogen and traffic)
ooOO00OOoo
 

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:00 pm

Sorry for hijacking the thread a bit Chris but I'd like to knwo how mine would go too.Specs in my sig. Don't know much about my mobo, but it's not a very flash one. It might be a good idea to note that most of my flying is in heavies around large cities..
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby VH-CC1 » Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:07 pm

if ya not in a hurry to find out.. I'll load fsx on my new system

specs

OOO
O
O
\/
VH-CC1
 

Postby benwynn » Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:58 pm

That will run FSX Pretty Well, just you might wana think about a DX-10 Graphics Card- Not essesntial and doesnt make alot of difference- But its the future of graphics smile.gif
User avatar
benwynn
Senior Member
 
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 1433
Location: YBBN

Postby HardCorePawn » Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:46 pm

benwynn wrote:
QUOTE(benwynn @ Aug 5 2007, 07:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That will run FSX Pretty Well, just you might wana think about a DX-10 Graphics Card- Not essesntial and doesnt make alot of difference- But its the future of graphics smile.gif


That's kind of like saying that Duke Nukem Forever is the future of gaming[1]... I'll believe it when I see it... dry.gif

[1]It was originally announced in 1997 blink.gif
Last edited by HardCorePawn on Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Son, we are about the break the surly bonds of gravity, and punch the face of God." -- Homer Simpson

Image
User avatar
HardCorePawn
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: 2500' above Godzone

Postby Kahu » Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:32 pm

I have found with autogen disabled and with a bit of tweaking fsx to your preference, the frame rates are higher and fsx looks far better than fs9.
My system is only 1GB of ram, radeon9800XT and a very old athlon xp 3000+.
Image
User avatar
Kahu
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 3:59 pm
Posts: 578
Location: Tauranga

Postby gokanru » Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:44 pm

Motherboard:Gigabyte GA-945PL-S3
CPU: E6400,2.13 core 2 duo
Memory: 2GB@533
Graphics: WinFast PX7600GS 256MB PCI 16x

This is what I call a low end system for FSX,I use reduced autogen textures,clouds and water which are all available from AVSIM.Except for around large airports,I get between 28-38FPS,around the large airports I drop to 12-15.I have also tweaked the config file so that I don't seem to get any blurries or stutters,also,SP1 for fsx has been installed.Autogen is full up,as is the level of detail radius.Mesh complexity is set at 80,Mesh resolution 1M,texture resolution=1M,Water High2x.Clouds are set to medium high,detailed.The one thing that really peeves me off about FSX is that when you fly over the southern alps there's hardly any snow and thats in the middle of winter,Mr M sure got that one wrong.
gokanru
 


Return to Technical Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests