Here is a few from me:











Sorry there isn't much of a variety, I still haven't really looked through my pictures properly!
Like I said, I'm keen to see others shots!
Cheers,
James.
100% ad-free











AlisterC wrote:QUOTE (AlisterC @ Jan 21 2013,8:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Wow great shots. You even know how to make Nanchangs look goodCheers for the pics
They look more like Yak 52 to me than Nanchangs
Naki wrote:QUOTE (Naki @ Jan 22 2013,12:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Fantastic shots .....what camera are you using?
Thanks! I am just using a Canon 550D with a 55-250mm, nothing fancy unfortunately.
Cheers.
leow5263 wrote:QUOTE (leow5263 @ Jan 22 2013,12:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Thanks! I am just using a Canon 550D with a 55-250mm, nothing fancy unfortunately.
Cheers.
The 550D really brings out the colours nicely. Do you find that it adds or bolsters the colour in any way? Not having been there I can't compare, but your shots look "rich" yet natural. Great detail on the exhaust of the P40 (?). I'd love to have a real camera again (my last proper one being a Minolta back in '99) - my Finepix S2400 is pretty rubbish, really. Only good thing really is it's long zoom. But 720p video recording, slow autofocus (esp on video), poor contrast autofocus, no manual zoom / focus and very average imaging is disappointing. It's the sort of camera that's a pile of compromises wrapped up in a cheap price...![]()
leow5263 wrote:QUOTE (leow5263 @ Jan 22 2013,6:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Scaber: Thanks a lot, I'm going up to Classic fighters at Easter so I'm looking forward to that, it should be a good show as always!
IslandBoy77: The 550D is a nice entry level camera. In the pictures I have boosted the colours a little. The images you get straight out of the camera are slightly flatter than what you see above and looks a bit more natural. Richer colours would probably been seen more if I had better quality lenses (the one I was using was just a kit lens). I have a 50mm 1.8 and the colours (and sharpness of course) are far superior over the 55-250mm which is what I was using at the show.
Here is a picture of the spitfire without any colour correction. (note I was shooting in Jpeg and not raw in this case):
http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb425/...pg?t=1358830631
The 550D is a fantastic entry level camera and I have been using it and the lenses for about 2 and a half years now.. I have been trying to upgrade my lenses.. but there are so many choices!
That being said I'm not a professional! There are lots of good reviews online though.. a DSLR is definably the way to go though!
Cheers,
James.
Awesome pics James Vthanks for sharing
Last edited by HamiltonWest on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.Awesome in NZ
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49222841@N06/
leow5263 wrote:QUOTE (leow5263 @ Jan 22 2013,6:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>IslandBoy77: The 550D is a nice entry level camera. In the pictures I have boosted the colours a little. The images you get straight out of the camera are slightly flatter than what you see above and looks a bit more natural. Richer colours would probably been seen more if I had better quality lenses (the one I was using was just a kit lens). I have a 50mm 1.8 and the colours (and sharpness of course) are far superior over the 55-250mm which is what I was using at the show.
Here is a picture of the spitfire without any colour correction. (note I was shooting in Jpeg and not raw in this case):
http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb425/...pg?t=1358830631
The 550D is a fantastic entry level camera and I have been using it and the lenses for about 2 and a half years now.. I have been trying to upgrade my lenses.. but there are so many choices!
That being said I'm not a professional! There are lots of good reviews online though.. a DSLR is definably the way to go though!
Cheers,
James.
I think it will be a while before I have enough money free to even think about going back to an SLR-style camera. The Minolta 8000i I had was only a film camera, but it was great for it's day (and very expensive: around $5k if I remember rightly - and it was 92-93 I go it, not '99). I had a look at the original photo in the link you posted: still a very nice image, even at the lower resolution posted: if my S2400 could supply me with that level, I'd be happy.
I guess I might be able to get more out of my camera if I really delved into the technical stuff, but with so many "active" hobbies, photography gets somewhat side-lined into "point and shoot". Sad, but true. I did think at one stage of moving into photography as a profession (back when I got the 8000i), but although I think I've got an ok eye for composition, I don't think I could have made a living out of it.
Anyway, thanks again for the info and sharing the pics: it's very reassuring when Gavin complements your work...
Return to New Zealand Aviation Photography
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests