NZFF

Posted: **Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:27 pm**

I want to get the 737.
Any comments on it.
How good are the wingviews?
Worth getting?

Posted: **Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:49 pm**

50North:
Model = good
Almost everything else = bad
Unreal flight dynamics, panel, default sound, poor GPS

On the other hand, there is the Wilco PIC model which I much prefer:
Model = average
The rest = great
Accurate dynamics, FMC, VC, good sounds.

Posted: **Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:18 pm**

I agree with Matt - go the wilco. When I fly I see the inside of the aircraft so super detailed external models just eat fps if you ask me.

Posted: **Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:38 pm**

Wilco's model is bad (too fat and not quite the right shape). Does it work with vista and Fs2004? (plus not enough money for it)

I can change the FDE. I already downloaded sounds and a panel (I'd just be getting the model).
All I want is a super realistic model with wingviews (which is why the Vistaliners doesn't work for me) and the FFX model isn't that flash but the 50 north seem to have got the whole model in proportion etc.

Posted: **Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:44 pm**

Kelburn wrote:
QUOTE (Kelburn @ Jun 29 2008, 02:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wilco's model is bad (too fat and not quite the right shape). Does it work with vista and Fs2004? (plus not enough money for it)

Correct, it's still worth getting for the realism. I think 50North is quite cheap from memory, so maybe save up for both, and merge the model from 50N with Wilco. Just an idea...

Yes, Wilco should work with Vista and FS9.

QUOTE

I can change the FDE. I already downloaded sounds and a panel (I'd just be getting the model).
All I want is a super realistic model with wingviews (which is why the Vistaliners doesn't work for me) and the FFX model isn't that flash but the 50 north seem to have got the whole model in proportion etc.[/quote]
If it's just the model you're after, then go for the 50North I guess. If you want the whole package, go Wilco.