Fokker 70/100

Discuss aircraft addons and repaints for Flight Simulator here

Postby Naki » Sat May 17, 2008 4:29 pm

See here
User avatar
Naki
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:03 pm
Posts: 7170
Location: Tauranga

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Sat May 17, 2008 4:30 pm

Looks good, but I prefer the freeware Fokker 70/100 from Project Fokker.
Last edited by victor_alpha_charlie on Sat May 17, 2008 8:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby Peppermint » Sat May 17, 2008 6:04 pm

Looks nice, but the free one from Project Fokker does it for me.
Peppermint
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 516
Location: Christchurch

Postby yak52dude » Sat May 17, 2008 6:35 pm

Thats a lot for a plane thats done almost just as good by project fokker don't you think? :lol:
yak52dude
 

Postby Alex » Sat May 17, 2008 7:33 pm

Looks like a really nicely done Pedestal - and I'm pretty sure the Project Fokker didn't have an FMC? :)

Looks like there is a weather radar there - and it's by Digital Aviation; they make some great products. ;)

Alex
Last edited by Alex on Sat May 17, 2008 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Sat May 17, 2008 8:10 pm

Alex wrote:
QUOTE (Alex @ May 17 2008, 07:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Looks like a really nicely done Pedestal - and I'm pretty sure the Project Fokker didn't have an FMC? :)

Looks like there is a weather radar there - and it's by Digital Aviation; they make some great products. ;)

Alex


I don't use the FMC, so as I said I'd rather not pay.
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby Alex » Sat May 17, 2008 8:12 pm

victor_alpha_charlie wrote:
QUOTE (victor_alpha_charlie @ May 17 2008, 08:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't use the FMC, so as I said I'd rather not pay.

That's fine Tom - I wasn't saying that you would/should. :)

Alex
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Sat May 17, 2008 8:13 pm

Alex wrote:
QUOTE (Alex @ May 17 2008, 08:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That's fine Tom - I wasn't saying that you would/should. :)

Alex


Oops, kinda misread you there :D
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby Alex » Sat May 17, 2008 8:18 pm

victor_alpha_charlie wrote:
QUOTE (victor_alpha_charlie @ May 17 2008, 08:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Oops, kinda misread you there :D

No worries; so easy to do when not face-to-face. :)

Alex
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby Peppermint » Sat May 17, 2008 8:19 pm

SO what's the main difference between the free project fokker and this one? Apart from the obvious one being payware the other freeware, payware having all the systems etc? Basically the same deal right?
Peppermint
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 516
Location: Christchurch

Postby Alex » Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm

From what I can see (and recall of the Project Fokker), it doesn't look like there is a huge amount of difference in the external model (although perhaps the F1 model is a tad more accurate/detailed); which is testament to the Project Fokker crew.

So, the difference would be made up in the cockpit (although "No VC at this time"), systems, and possibly flight dynamics... :)

Alex
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby hinch » Sat May 17, 2008 11:34 pm

The reason it is pay...

- Full system simulation
- Sexy Vector gauges
- Look at those panel graphics!

It reminds me a lot of the Leonardo Mad Dog.
hinch
 


Return to Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests