100% ad-free

peebee wrote:QUOTE(peebee @ Jul 27 2007, 01:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Just saw the previeuw of the latest NL2000 version, looks awsome
I have the earlier version, which I found a little hard on the framerates, I just wonder if this one is better and how it would run on FS9
Well I had been planning on running it last night... but was testing some aircraft performance for the big ARNZ FNF NZAA to NZWN race while I was installing it all... so the install took the better part of an hour or so!
By then I was too tired to actually try it out, but the feature panel that it installs is very cool... allows you to turn on/off lots of things (AI - commercial + GA doing TnG's or little AtoB flights, disable 2004 default, Big Giant town names so you know what is where, real-world Navaids + disable 2004 defaults, runway textures etc etc.)
For the rotorbunnies, there are at least 40 helipads spread over the entire country at airports, hospitals, a couple of ships and about 3 or 4 oil rigs...
I hope to get a good run at it either tonight, or over the weekend and put up some screeniesLast edited by HardCorePawn on Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total."Son, we are about the break the surly bonds of gravity, and punch the face of God." -- Homer Simpson
Just gota get some photoreal for southern England, mmm London to Amsterdam trips in the 763

HardCorePawn wrote:QUOTE(HardCorePawn @ Jul 27 2007, 04:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>For those who asked (Charl, Ran, Jimmy & Mike), I have burned the discs today and chucked them in the post... I would assume they would arrive either Monday or Tuesday next week
You da man HCP...
Some trepidation/anticipation here, it is kind of large isn't it?
So much to go wrong, maybe?
These guys certainly have pushed the envelope, again.
Can't wait.

Take a look at the screenshots here. The first picture shows a virtual me having just buzzed the airfield at Seppe in The Netherlands. It's a lovely autumn day, the sun is shining and if it wasn't for the noise of the engine you could hear the insects buzzing and birds chirping in the hedge below...
As an aside, why am I flying all over The Netherlands?
One reason is that it is quite flat, so you know that if you are on the ground when you hit zero feet! (Actually, parts of the Netherlands are below sea level, so you still need to take care!) But that's not the main reason.
If you loaded up your Flight Simulator and and flew from Voensdrecht to Seppe, which is what I've done here, you wouldn't see what I see, and herein lies the strength, or weakness, of this simulator.
The scenery I see is from The Netherlands 2000, an addon scenery package covering the entire Netherlands. Basically, apart from a few select cities -- most in the USA -- the default landscape is somewhat generic, but more accurate, detailed and realistic scenery can be added either by buying addon packs, or by downloading free files from the Web.
The Netherlands 2000 is a particularly effective addon, and is available free. It is a large download, about 50 megabytes, so be prepared for a lengthy download time if you use a dial-up connection.






There are no mesh issues, as there is essentially no elevation anywhere in sight.
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE(Ian Warren @ Aug 1 2007, 11:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>...The First International flight to New Zeeland on 11th September 1928 landing at Wigram , Charl ? es Kingsford Smith with kiwis H.A.Litchfield NAV and T.H.McWilliams Radio ... .. for interest sake ...14hrs 25 mins flyin time
Wonder if there's a colour picture of that aircraft somewhere?
Fokker's range was maybe 700 miles
14 hours at 100 kts - inside must've been full of 44 gal drums and the Kiwis would've pumped gas all the way.
I digress:
Having done the low 'n slow, time to get up 'n high to see what the photoreal does.
So a trip from Dusseldorf to Glasgow, takes us nicely across the Netherlands.
Here's Germany as rendered by GE PRO: (If it looks dark and murky, that's your monitor - time to upgrade)
and looking the other way, onto NL2000 photoreal
At this altitude and speed, things start lagging badly within a short time:
although curiously EHAM loads pinsharp
The verdict?
For this scenery, fly Fokker low 'n slow.
Anything else, you will feel as if you are scooting over a washed-out flat sheet.
Charl wrote:QUOTE(Charl @ Aug 7 2007, 02:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE(Ian Warren @ Aug 1 2007, 11:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>...The First International flight to New Zeeland on 11th September 1928 landing at Wigram , Charl ? es Kingsford Smith with kiwis H.A.Litchfield NAV and T.H.McWilliams Radio ... .. for interest sake ...14hrs 25 mins flyin time
Wonder if there's a colour picture of that aircraft somewhere?
Fokker's range was maybe 700 miles
14 hours at 100 kts - inside must've been full of 44 gal drums and the Kiwis would've pumped gas all the way.
I digress:
Having done the low 'n slow, time to get up 'n high to see what the photoreal does.
So a trip from Dusseldorf to Glasgow, takes us nicely across the Netherlands.
Here's Germany as rendered by GE PRO: (If it looks dark and murky, that's your monitor - time to upgrade)
(images)
The verdict?
For this scenery, fly Fokker low 'n slow.
Anything else, you will feel as if you are scooting over a washed-out flat sheet.
I have colour photos of the replica they built for the Bi-cen 1988 Aussie airshow , and many b/w pic s from history books... Ill dig all up sat send if requiredLast edited by Ian Warren on Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ian Warren- NZFF Pro
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
- Posts: 41187
- Location: AREA 51
Trolly wrote:QUOTE(Trolly @ Aug 1 2007, 12:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>There are no mesh issues, as there is essentially no elevation anywhere in sight.
Thats the reason I don't particually like my Getmapping UK VFR photoreal. It literally looks like you are zooming over the top of a photograph- not nearly as realistic as the original Godzone magazine stuff
Coming from New Zealand, you're not exactly short of bumpy scenery. In comparison, almost everywhere else IS flat!
England, being not-flat. Yes I know it's a cr*p approach: the next one was better, when I wasn't busy taking pictures!
Of course, if you want to fly over the top at 36000ft in a tube, it's probably not worth bothering, since all you're going to see with any photo scenery is mush.

a few seconds of flying and its blured agian, even on finals at like 150knts...
[EDIT]Sorry about the double post, don't know what happened there. Mod can feal free to delete my other post, just not this one please.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests