Page 1 of 2

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:11 pm
by scon
Just new to flightsim.com is a new mesh for AU and NZ. Comes in 4 parts just I'm downloading now. For FSX

File Names are

aunz1.zip
aunz2.zip
aunz3.zip
aunz4.zip

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:13 pm
by JonARNZ
Resolution? Well spotted!

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:14 pm
by scon
JonARNZ wrote: Resolution? Well spotted!

Don't know the Resolution yet

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:17 pm
by JonARNZ
Yeah, the readme gives nothing away either...

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:19 pm
by scon
JonARNZ wrote: Yeah, the readme gives nothing away either...

Man do you have it already ( they are big flies )

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:05 pm
by Zöltuger
anyone installed it yet?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:54 pm
by Jimmy
hmmm, why make a mesh when the RBE one works great in fsx?

If they don't state the resolution then it can't be that great.. But big files? How big?

James

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:01 pm
by ZK-Brock
Well, to be honest I'm not really sure how to work the RBE 75m mesh in FSX, with the resolution slider in there.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:16 pm
by Zöltuger
I've got the RBE 75m mesh installed, so I've set my slider to 76m, looks pretty good.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:10 pm
by JonARNZ
scon wrote:
JonARNZ wrote: Yeah, the readme gives nothing away either...

Man do you have it already ( they are big flies )

Yeah, all up about 300MB I think. No I dont have it yet, I used the view function on flightsim.com to see the files

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:56 am
by JonARNZ
300 MB's later and I have some before and after shots. Befores show FSX default on maximum mesh settings. After show thefree mesh installed.

Mount cook looking towards the mountain

Before
user posted image

After
user posted image

Mount cook 45 degrees to the right of last shot, at altitude

Before
user posted image

After
user posted image

Milford Sound

Before
user posted image

After
user posted image

Some weird stuff going on in this part of the country :wacko:

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:01 am
by johanfrc
I must say that I can't see why downloading 300 mb's will help? Millford looks a bit better, but not that "good".

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:12 am
by scon
I have mine set at 76M at doing a flight from NZAA to NZWN in a 737 last night I didn't notice a difference.


How do you get the RBE mesh working in FSX and does anyone have a different landclass installed, I have a free one I found on the RBE site, ( would a LC affect how a mesh looks )

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:16 am
by ZK-Brock
Also,could someone tell us what the approximate resolution of the default NZ mesh is?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:05 am
by Jimmy
haha you sure you didn't just upload your before shot for the after one too Jon :lol: honestly I can't see a differance!

Not worth 300mbs at all!

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:06 am
by toprob
FSX default mesh for NZ is based on SRTM 90 metre data, which for use in FS2004 was resampled to 76 metres. I assume the same applies for FSX. That's why to get the full effect of the default mesh you set your mesh to 76 metres.
Trying to increase the resolution by resampling is basically making up the intermediate detail, so really you are looking at a 90 metre resolution.
SRTM data for around Milford is damaged -- hence the huge rounded mountains, which I've always imagined are scans of clouds. Incidentally, you can fix the elevation to some degree by using a non-SRTM mesh such as Christian's, but the topo data (rivers etc) is kind of locked to the damaged data, so it will still display funny.
Christian's freeware 75 metre mesh is not based on SRTM data, so it doesn't have the messed-up Milford, and it is also resampled from much higher resolution data -- the same data which produced the 20 metre mesh (I assume) so it is inherently more accurate.
That's why Christian's freeware mesh will display better in FSX -- although since there are changes to the way mesh is created in FSX, it may or may not perform as well. What we really need is a 75 metre mesh recompiled for native FSX. However I don't notice any real performance hit from his 20 metre mesh in FSX.
It is possible these days to obtain SRTM data greater than 90 metre resolution, but I don't know if that is available for NZ, and I don't know if it is used in this new mesh. Looking at the Milford screenshot suggests that this is based on newer data.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:45 am
by Bingobob
Not exactly the kind of thing I wanted to see to get me to change to FSX yet!

Can I also point out that SRTM stands for Shuttle Radar Topography Mission which means the same stuff we have now is the same as was around when Nasa flew the SRTM mission.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:44 am
by Christian
Robin explained it really well.

I wouldn't recommend the 300MB download. FSX is already using SRTM data and it looks to me that this 'new' mesh is also SRTM. Not much point. The only difference seems to be that the 'new' mesh is using an updated SRTM where the cloud cover is fixed. (Coincidentally, the people who supplied that fix to the SRTM people is GeographX.)

For Australia, it's probably very similar to what's in FSX already as well...

The freeware RBE is better because it's actual resolution is 76 m, not 90 m like the STRM. As Robin said, it's based on the same data as the 20m mesh.

How to install? Simple. If you only have FSX just run the installer. If you want to use it for FS9 and FSX, copy the Red Baron NZ mesh folder into Addon Scenery in FSX and add to the scenery library.

A fix for the muckup in Milford Sound also exists. I released a patch for the RBE topo a few weeks ago. If you own the topo, copy it across to FSX and install the patch and Milford Sound is fixed!

Cheers,
Christian

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:07 pm
by Timmo
Measured around Whakatane, Default FSX data is 0.000915 decimal degrees which works out to about 100m

Im not sure how variable this is around the country though

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:53 pm
by JonARNZ
Jimmy wrote: haha you sure you didn't just upload your before shot for the after one too Jon :lol: honestly I can't see a differance!

Not worth 300mbs at all!

Thanks for that Jimmy. If you look more closely, but take your glasses off because it seems your only looking through one eye, you will see quite a difference, particularly in the last shot in Milford.

The question is, is it enough for people to download? Thats up to them to decide, at least now they can see a comparison, surely thats a good thing?