Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:59 pm
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:39 pmPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:38 amfrostynz wrote:QUOTE (frostynz @ Jun 30 2011,11:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I really appreciate what you give to the NZ Flight sim community.
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:40 amPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:46 am 
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:27 pm
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:44 pmPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:37 pmrayclyde wrote:QUOTE (rayclyde @ Jul 1 2011,12:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I also would like to thank you. Have only installed Napier at this stage and do not see the ships and cranes at the port. I seem to have installed all the object files you have mentioned plus VLC etc. What am I missing?
Clyde Williams
Levin
You are missing nothing Clyde.
The ships and objects at the port are not a part of the airport scenery.
Its a totally separate "companion" scenery im working on, just as i did for FS9.
Lawrie.Nzeddy wrote:QUOTE (Nzeddy @ Jul 1 2011,12:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>VLC
versus
Raw Napier photoreal
Well, pretty close to fitting the photoreal ground textures..
I see i may have to do a modified version to fit the photoreal when its finished,.............. assuming of course youre not building an airport
to go with the photoreal................
Lawrie.
OK Eddy , ive seen this this many times before , now what one is in the correct placement , the airport or the photo ?
Thanks Snowman ... awesome. I've been using your FS04 version for some time now but it tended to cut frame rates in half ... this FSX one will be just the thing.
Cheers Esq.
Thankyou Snowman. So good to see you back again. These really are quality sceneries. You just get better and better. So glad you finally succumbed to FSX
Well Done,
Paul
Esquire wrote:QUOTE (Esquire @ Jul 1 2011,8:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Thanks Snowman ... awesome. I've been using your FS04 version for some time now but it tended to cut frame rates in half ... this FSX one will be just the thing.
Cheers Esq.
Depends which FS2004 version you were using. I did 2 of them over the years.
The second version was MUCH better in every respect, including frame rates in FS2004.
Lawrie.
Snowman wrote:QUOTE (Snowman @ Jul 1 2011,1:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>assuming of course youre not building an airport to go with the photoreal................
Yeah, just an afcad with VLC libraries and default FSX library objects. But I'll probably stop working on it as your Hawkes Bay airports is better than mine!
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 1 2011,1:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>OK Eddy , ive seen this this many times before , now what one is in the correct placement , the airport or the photo ?
The photo.
Nzeddy wrote:QUOTE (Nzeddy @ Jul 1 2011,11:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yeah, just an afcad with VLC libraries and default FSX library objects. But I'll probably stop working on it as your Hawkes Bay airports is better than mine!
The photo.
Well thats easy then you had better get that photo across to Lawrie to adjust and you can carry on with the autogen
