
Posted:
Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:02 pm
by scon
Yes, those constructive comments help the Flight Simulation community, you would think that if you have nothing nice to say then don’t say it. But hey that might just be me.

Posted:
Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:13 pm
by Adamski
scon wrote:Yes, those constructive comments help the Flight Simulation community, you would think that if you have nothing nice to say then don’t say it. But hay that might just be me.
I'm not sure who you're actually replying to

... but I don't see anything that negative here. I take it as a request - *we would like a good model (inside and outside) for FSX* - what's wrong with that? The FS9 version ported into FSX is useable, but it's nowhere near as good as many freeware aircraft for FSX. Hell, I wouldn't mind a good PAYWARE 146 for FSX.

Posted:
Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:13 pm
by leow5263
that model made by Jon Murchison thats basicly a very sure sign they are great quality. and if you download them you will find they are.

Posted:
Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:23 pm
by Adamski
leow5263 wrote:that model made by Jon Murchison thats basicly a very sure sign they are great quality. and if you download them you will find they are.
Agreed - Jon's stuff is *excellent*. I think the problem here, though, is porting it to FSX. I'm not near my FS PC at the moment, but from memory, I think there were problems with either/both the 2D and VC panels. Usual FS9->FSX problems, I think.
Also, some native FSX freeware (outside) models have significantly more detail in the textures than their FS9 equivalents.

Posted:
Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:12 pm
by Naki
MODS!!!!