Ian Warren wrote:Jezzz , I should be in Politics , total reversal ...
Always buy New Zealand made first , come on you guys , Timmo's work is already freely out there , its good , .. Im looking at the quality backup service with being a NZFF member
I will purchase and look at the Orbx version , but have feelings Mr Tim Barnes has really stepped up to the mark .
Its going to be an interesting 2010 .
I guess I need to practise what I preach -- I've always said that competition is a good thing, and Orbx have filled a huge gap in FSX for Australia, making it a lot more attractive.
One thing which excited me about Timmo's scenery is that New Zealand airports 'fit' a lot better, compared to the stark contrast between a photo airport and the default textures. This means that I don't need to worry as much about aerial photos, and can concentrate on the actual airports. The mess which is aerial imagery in New Zealand at the moment, since the military got into sourcing and distributing, means that my original plans of a photographic New Zealand are just not going to happen.
Hopefully this blending will work just as well with Orbx. As I said, Orbx textures are attractive, but I'd need to live with it for a while to see how accurate they are. I am aware, though, that the general simmer can't help but love the little touches which make Orbx what it is. I have a lot of questions -- for instance, one of the major issues I have with FSX is the difference between the landclass textures and the autogen trees -- there is normally no colour-matching, which is one reason why the trees look so unrealistic. Orbx solve this beautifully by only using the trees which match. Which isn't a lot, so although it looks really good in Australia, I don't know how one or two trees repeated endlessly over New Zealand would add to the 'realism'.
Like Ian, and most of us I guess, I'd buy both. For all I know '2010' might be an Australianism for next Christmas. A year is a long time in FS, so I wouldn't worry too much about Timmo...
In 2010 New Zealand developers will have the chance to make some great airports, without having to spend all the time and resources just to make their lovely airport look like it belongs in the sim.
Reading this back, it does seem like a bit of a left-handed compliment (with apologies to left-handers -- I'm kind of proud of the sinister connotations) to Orbx, but this not my intention. I am a bit wary of their marketing methods, but I do have a tremendous respect for their business. In the long-run they can only help us local simmers. But they are not the answer to everything when it comes to FSX.