NZFF - New Zealand's Premier Flight Simulation Community

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Pilot charged over Queenstown takeoff
Charl
post Mar 6 2012,7:20 AM
Post #1


NZFF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 5,664
Joined: 1-May 06
From: Auckland
Member No.: 40



I've never been comfortable as an airline passenger out of Queenstown.
Not incoming, funnily enough, just out.
There's always an issue, somehow.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/6529067/Pi...enstown-takeoff


--------------------
___________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________________________
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cowpatz
post Mar 6 2012,7:52 AM
Post #2


Sim-holic
****

Group: Members
Posts: 997
Joined: 7-March 07
Member No.: 365



This should never have gone to court. I have no idea why CAA have pursued it to the degree that they have. Muscle flexing me thinks and one which significantly erodes the regulators relationship with it's "clients".


--------------------
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adamski
post Mar 6 2012,1:22 PM
Post #3


^ That's not me - HONEST!
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 3,538
Joined: 1-November 07
From: Birkenhead, Auckland
Member No.: 859



QUOTE (cowpatz @ Mar 6 2012,8:52 AM) *
This should never have gone to court. I have no idea why CAA have pursued it to the degree that they have. Muscle flexing me thinks and one which significantly erodes the regulators relationship with it's "clients".

I'm intrigued as to why they're charging the *pilot*. Shouldn't they be charging the airline?


--------------------


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chopper_nut
post Mar 6 2012,1:27 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,224
Joined: 25-October 06
From: Bathurst NSW
Member No.: 218



The Campaign Against Aviation strikes again.


--------------------


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZK-MAT
post Mar 6 2012,1:41 PM
Post #5


Surfie
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,686
Joined: 30-April 06
From: Papamoa
Member No.: 38



I'm comfortable with someone being charged if they breach a rule. He broke the rule and departed too late, didn't he?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adamski
post Mar 6 2012,1:50 PM
Post #6


^ That's not me - HONEST!
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 3,538
Joined: 1-November 07
From: Birkenhead, Auckland
Member No.: 859



QUOTE (ZK-MAT @ Mar 6 2012,2:41 PM) *
I'm comfortable with someone being charged if they breach a rule. He broke the rule and departed too late, didn't he?

Depends on what the rule is - apparently, he was going by Pacblue operating procedures <???>.


--------------------


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SA227
post Mar 6 2012,2:33 PM
Post #7


Forum Addict
***

Group: Members
Posts: 174
Joined: 6-April 08
Member No.: 1,073



There is no rule, however you do have to abide by what ever your company exposition says so we shall see what happens.
CAA now have a policy of using the big stick rather than waving it about, whether that is a good or bad thing I guess depends on the situation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Charl
post Mar 6 2012,5:06 PM
Post #8


NZFF Pro
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 5,664
Joined: 1-May 06
From: Auckland
Member No.: 40



QUOTE (cowpatz @ Mar 6 2012,8:52 AM) *
...Muscle flexing me thinks
The facts are going to come out in court, which is important.

As I said, I've had some "Strange" experiences leaving Queenstown.
I knew we were all going to die, the day a Qantas 737 delayed and delayed its take-off, then took off into a descending cloud base and dwindling light.
He decided he couldn't get out after all, and then flew figures-of-eight with us under the cloud, ever lower.
He eventually burned off enough fuel to get down to landing weight, and duly and quickly did.
I want him in court, too...




--------------------
___________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________________________
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bazza
post Mar 6 2012,7:55 PM
Post #9


Sim-holic
****

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 15-July 06
From: Tauranga
Member No.: 104



QUOTE (Charl @ Mar 6 2012,6:06 PM) *
The facts are going to come out in court, which is important.


This is the whole point of the exercise. The matter has been forwarded to the appropriate tribunal to assess the matter. I'm sure the decision to go
ahead was taken after a lot of examination and research and any emotional opinions from people outside the loop doesn't help anything.

Wait and see....?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 8:15 AM